Email Detail

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/22KCCBCDHM26DWPQFSTXBXS2LB3P6UJO/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/22KCCBCDHM26DWPQFSTXBXS2LB3P6UJO/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAEMY9FdahyQQ_GTh+RkQCvAgVHrMCYfGrzwo2VF3+TYzCEm=iw@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "22KCCBCDHM26DWPQFSTXBXS2LB3P6UJO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/22KCCBCDHM26DWPQFSTXBXS2LB3P6UJO/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kb1pvh (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "946baa6fd780451aa988d177f6f74dbd",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/946baa6fd780451aa988d177f6f74dbd/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Dave Webb KB1PVH",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question",
    "date": "2019-06-22T02:07:37Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Ted,\n\n Let this 'no code General' help you with satellite info.\n\n   https://www.amsat.org/fm-satellite-frequency-summary/\n<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/fm-satellite-frequency-summary/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254160994000&usg=AFQjCNG7dWjgtEyOweXCkqAkI9e64cZGfQ>\n\n\n   https://www.amsat.org/linear-satellite-frequency-summary/\n<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/linear-satellite-frequency-summary/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254346840000&usg=AFQjCNGewg2AStA8hSG9Uslnv_YsG2iSvQ>\n\n\n    https://www.amsat.org/two-way-satellites/\n<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/two-way-satellites/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254361232000&usg=AFQjCNELoQFI1Og3TAUwqD5zFWe9rRxsMA>\n\n\n\nYou can love the ARRL all you want, it's OK. I personally feel that no info\nis better than wrong info. And in full disclaimer, I haven't been an AMSAT\nmember or ARRL member for some time because I didn't agree with things, but\nyet I contribute and try to help those that have operating questions. At\nleast I'm not on an ARRL BB complaining about them and not a member. Gotta\ngo now and try keeping that horse stuff in the stalls.\n\n\nDave-KB1PVH\n\n\nSent from my Galaxy S9\n\nOn Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 9:34 PM Ted Krempa <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> And yet the AMSAT US web page does NOT have a current list of ALL amateur\n> sats (aka, known as 'updating a web page' to us 'no code Generals'), NOR a\n> current set of numbers for sats that is updated weekly (aka, known as\n> 'updating a web page' to us 'no code Generals').\n>\n> ARRL has its faults but they are light years ahead of AMSAT US when it\n> comes\n> to protecting your ability to generate RF on the ham bands, satellite or\n> otherwise. I'll give my 40 bucks to ARRL long before I give it to some POB\n> in Maryland.\n>\n> Keep the stuff in your horse stalls there, Dave. Don't peddle it here\n>\n> 73, K7TRK\n>\n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Webb\n> KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB\n> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 5:59 PM\n> To: AMSAT -BB\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question\n>\n> Because I find it extremely laughable that they are supposed to be the\n> Grand Wizard of all Ham Radio and they can't give correct info on\n> satellites, but I'm supposed to rely on them to defend my interests in\n> radio?\n>\n>  I understand satellites are a small niche, but come on...if you don't know\n> what you are talking about just point people to AMSAT. It was noted a\n> couple weeks ago on one of their posts that info was incorrect but\n> apparently they didn't feel the need to correct it.\n>\n>\n>\n> Dave-KB1PVH\n>\n>\n> Sent from my Galaxy S9\n>\n> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 8:34 PM Ted Krempa <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n> > Just curious....instead of irrational bashing of ARRL (which looks after\n> > ALL\n> > ham radio interests, including minor niche groups like sat operators) ,\n> why\n> > can't the answer simply be to adjust either the up or down frequency? The\n> > 'computer control' has nothing to do with it, no?\n> >\n> > 73, K7TRK\n> >\n> > -----Original Message-----\n> > From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave\n> Webb\n> > KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB\n> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:12 PM\n> > To: AMSAT -BB\n> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question\n> >\n> > The ARRL can't even get frequencies correct so it's no surprise they are\n> > wrong about which frequency to adjust.\n> >\n> >  If you aren't using computer control to be able to adjust uplink and\n> > downlink you adjust the higher of the two frequencies.\n> >\n> > Dave-KB1PVH\n> >\n> >\n> > Sent from my Galaxy S9\n> >\n> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 3:05 PM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]>\n> > wrote:\n> >\n> > > On the official ARRL VHF/UHF info sheet\n> > > (\n> > >\n> >\n> >\n>\n> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20\n> > Rev%20A.pdf\n> >\n> <\n> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%2\n> 0Rev%20A.pdf\n> <http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20Rev%20A.pdf>\n> >\n> > > )\n> > >  they suggest that for satellite QSOs operators should only adjust\n> their\n> > > receive frequency regardless of whether it is VHF or UHF. I thought\n> > > standard procedure was to adjust the higher frequency whether it is\n> > > transmit or receive.\n> > >\n> > > Steve AI9IN\n> > > _______________________________________________\n> > > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> > Opinions\n> > > expressed\n> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views\n> of\n> > > AMSAT-NA.\n> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> > program!\n> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> > >\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> > AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> >\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}