Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAPvDab33vp7OJ8gD1r3SNnYEkH74-4W9rT4wmMBVizGD69RKvg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "badencapecod (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "228ae4f5c3d547ef8d3f4c2b1e03205d",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/228ae4f5c3d547ef8d3f4c2b1e03205d/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Wes Baden",
    "subject": "[AMSAT-BB] Operating Practices",
    "date": "2022-02-12T14:38:17Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FKF5OPETUJCQFG2R7WP77K45NUN2YSVL/?format=api",
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/A3N7TAWKS3E4Y3AZVWSZK3K355ERHLD4/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I second the recent posting regarding CW activity in satellite bandpasses.\nAbsent compelling reasons otherwise (for example, that rare DX entity\noperating CW high up), band management works much better when CW stations\noperate in the lower half of bandpasses.  Along the same lines, I'll say\nthat, when operating CW, especially working weak stations, it can be very\nfrustrating to be QRM'd by one or more S9 SSB stations in the bottom half\nof bandpasses.  This is particularly true when they're calling CQ after CQ,\neither not hearing or ignoring CW signals nearby.\n\nAt the risk of appearing grumpy (my apologies), there lately seems to be a\nnumber of CW stations looking for their downlink signal by keeping RX on\none frequency, then tuning TX and simultaneously sending dits at high\nspeed.  When they are S9 they create quite a bit of QRM as well, to both\nSSB and CW ops.  I understand, of course, the need to match RX and TX\nfreqs--I tune manually myself, without software that helps automatically.\nBut isn't the better procedure to briefly key down on one freq, away from\nthe center of the bandpass, and then tune your RX and find your downlink as\nquickly as possible?  This minimizes QRMing others.  I've also found that\ndoing this regularly makes it possible to guess pretty accurately where TX\nand RX freqs need to be.  For instance, on RS-44, when it comes over the\nnorth to my QTH, I'm within 1-2 KHz of matching up TX and RX by setting\ntuning at 145.960 MHz and 435.648 MHz respectively.\n\nAll this said, I confess that I was a Mad Ditter myself when I first got on\nsatellites two years ago.  I received a couple of emails--always friendly,\nalways helpful--from old timers about the above.  This general email is\nsent out in the same spirit.  Satellite operation is different from HF, and\nthere definitely is a learning curve involved.\n\n73 from FN54,\nWes NA1ME\n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H/?format=api",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "utf-8",
            "size": 3085,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/22P32LE2G52H6CJ6NUONR2DZXRTYKX6H/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}