Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2AXJPHYP7ENL7HW6HNWUQGJLQGVWIZBX/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "2AXJPHYP7ENL7HW6HNWUQGJLQGVWIZBX",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2AXJPHYP7ENL7HW6HNWUQGJLQGVWIZBX/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "g7hia (a) btinternet.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Heath",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  SSB Operation on the Satellites",
    "date": "2011-06-09T10:23:52Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3C7W4LQE4K42CU4MCFPSA537XO2NEVBG/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Satelliters,\n \nMight cause some flames with this  but here goes:\n \nWith a good few years of operating on the SSB sats, AO's-10,13,40, RS10, \nFO-20,FO-29 and 98 countries confirmed I can agree totally with the \"one true \nrule\" in theory. When stations at each end of the QSO use the method it works \nflawlessly, I have done it with QSO partners using Fod track and with Instantrak \ncomputer Doppler correction, but there is the problem.\n \nMany of the stations that you want to work will be using manual tuning methods, \nso as you maintain your frequencies at the satellite, according to the rule, \nyour QSO partner will have to search for you. Then when its your turn to \ntransmit he will have to search for you. \n\n \nThe practical solution that I and I believe most of the ops. I have worked seem \nto use is to have short overs and to adjust frequencies the TX to try and keep \nthe QSO in a fixed spot on the receiver.\n \nFollowing the other \"often recommended\" method of adjusting the higher frequency \nirrespective of its function, up link or down link, cause QSO's to drift across \nthe pass band causing problems for other users.\n \nThe other point worth making for newcomers to the SSB birds is to start on the \neasy passes/satellites first to get the knack of manual tuning. For example, try \nVO-52 with its 2m downlink, and to pick low elevation passes where the rate of \nchange of frequency due to Doppler shift is less. Don't expect to get it right \nwith near overhead passes of FO-29 until you have delevop  your skills.\n \nWe were all beginners once so don't be afraid to have a  go and make a few \nmistakes.\nI am pleased to say that in my experience the SSB satellites have a great user \ncommunity who maintain high operating standard and welcome new ops.\n \nHave fun on the birds\n \n73 John G7HIA\n \nLamenting the loss of our lovely HEO birds, Happy Days !!\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}