Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2I7HN4AP53EABXSLV2LHLT7SP3VTI574/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CAONiDGfyGETVLWNn=bJY6AYDOUkRXNO1hUFz+C99Tj5+fnXBdg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "2I7HN4AP53EABXSLV2LHLT7SP3VTI574",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/DITWDTCPJWJTOLSDJALWPANQHR2OCJMS/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "medicatlarge14 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Ron Lewis",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] QRZ.com",
    "date": "2020-04-20T20:59:08Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/LY5JF7QI5QUYUZS6E653JEIA7Z7UVCG2/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "The problem I am having with QRZ.com is most people use other logging\nsoftware that migrates or populates into QRZ.com. However, if you log your\nQSO's on QRZ.com, people who use LoTW don't like to upload QSO's on QRZ.com\nand want only LoTW, even though the they have a QRZ.com account.\n\n\n\nOn Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 16:16 Jerry via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> You need to log a sat qso with propagation mode SAT, uplink freq at the\n> satellite(some are using the transverters IF freq which is not allways the\n> same) the sat-name, the mode...\n> If it's logged without the SAT propagation mode, it looks like a\n> terrestrial contact, and that's a huge difference.\n> It's very important for award hunters.\n>\n> So you need to use a good logging program. There would be much more\n> matches in LOTW, EQSL etc. if people upload correctly.\n> More than 20% of received online qsl is rejected on my side due to\n> incorrect logging.\n> Using here VQlog for years without any problems so far. I'm not aware of\n> any other good sat-logging software, but of course there will be good ones\n> too.\n>\n> 73's,\n>\n> Jerry ON4CJQ\n>\n> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----\n> Van: \"amsat-bb\" <[email protected]>\n> Aan: \"amsat-bb\" <[email protected]>\n> Verzonden: Maandag 20 april 2020 07:05:27\n> Onderwerp: [amsat-bb] QRZ.com\n>\n> Has anybody found a way to  upload satellite contacts to a QRZ log and\n> have them easily be confirmed? The glitch seems to be that QRZ.com wants\n> the transmit and receive frequencies to be the same, it does not seem\n> able to accept QSOs that were made duplex. Thanks!\n>\n> Bob N6REK\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}