Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2KEJRZIQE4KNADJVN56XSTA6R22AFOHJ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "2KEJRZIQE4KNADJVN56XSTA6R22AFOHJ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2KEJRZIQE4KNADJVN56XSTA6R22AFOHJ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "christopher.maness (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "66d900bc11e54830a83213b991bacaac",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/66d900bc11e54830a83213b991bacaac/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Christopher Maness",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] FT-736R vs. TS-2000X",
    "date": "2016-05-11T20:41:49Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/75ETDE4G56ILKXYTCC4WOD3SWSQNYALP/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have recently picked up both a TS-2000X and a FT-736R in a sale.  I plan on selling one as I already have too many radios.  I am not real active on the birds, but I occasionally get on, and usually work them for my club on FD.  I have done some pro/con research on these radios, and I am slightly leaning towards the TS-2000X.  I have heard that the FT-736R is a better radio, but is it so much better that it beats all the features that the TS-2000X has.  I like the fact that it has a sub receiver so that I can work the FM birds full duplex, and I also like that it has a full 100W on 2m.  I am thinking that if the receiver on the 2000 is deaf on VHF/UHF, I can add a preamp.  Also, I have worked the June VHF/UHF contest in the bast an am considering working it again this June.\n\nAny thoughts?\nRegards,\nChris KQ6UP",
    "attachments": []
}