Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2LTMV62DDCVZB7LMVHSU7KU4S2P6KUJX/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "002d01c872a8$3fdefe30$0400a8c0@parents",
    "message_id_hash": "2LTMV62DDCVZB7LMVHSU7KU4S2P6KUJX",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7GI6DO5LPGCROD5WPRMXXA5ALXRH3WNK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka3hsw (a) earthlink.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "George Henry",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: proposing a new gentleman's rule...",
    "date": "2008-02-19T03:33:52Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/7GI6DO5LPGCROD5WPRMXXA5ALXRH3WNK/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "That's the way I have always done it, since the days of RS-10/11 and \n12/13...  \"CQ AO-27\" or whatever.\n\nGeorge, KA3HSW\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Auke de Jong, VE6PWN\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"AMSAT-BB\" <[email protected]>\nSent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:47 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] proposing a new gentleman's rule...\n\n\n> In light of hearing some stations calling \"CQ\" or \"CQ Satellite\" and then \n> failing to reply to the terurn calls, I have realized that there is a need \n> for a new procedure to be used when calling \"CQ\" on satellites.  This is \n> needed in order to address multiple satellites sharing a common uplink \n> frequency, and having overlapping(or nearly-so) footprints.  In \n> particular, AO-51 and AO-16 are using 145.92 FM for their voice uplinks, \n> and their footprints are presently seperated by only a few minutes.\n>\n> Perhaps the considerate operator should be naming the satellite that they \n> are trying to use while calling, in order to avoid confusion or \n> frustration when the operator's calls might be inadvertently received on \n> multiple sats at once.\n>\n> Any thoughts?\n>\n> Auke de Jong\n> VE6PWN\n> DO33go\n> Edmonton, AB\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}