Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2PIKBJZGQ3ZXM2CTLBNLXP2IAQSXQ5CH/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "2PIKBJZGQ3ZXM2CTLBNLXP2IAQSXQ5CH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/QQMNLOYTK4JRF3J4NV4RZRUEEOEJMYJU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lucleblanc6 (a) videotron.ca",
        "mailman_id": "9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9e00802147284c40880480833e06c230/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Luc Leblanc VE2DWE",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band interference solution",
    "date": "2006-10-06T02:54:55Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/QQMNLOYTK4JRF3J4NV4RZRUEEOEJMYJU/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 5 Oct 2006 at 13:12, John Champa wrote:\n\n\n> \n> Why am I rambling on like this?  Because the result of all this is that \n> satellite Hams can send a signal on a 50k mile round trip to some bird they \n> helped design (remotely) and build (remotely) themselves, but they can NOT \n> figure out how to manage a $60 unlicensed wireless device their neighbor \n> bought at Best Buy.  So they spend hours on this reflector lamenting the \n> potential loss of a cherished Mode S instead applying just a tiny little bit \n> of traditional Amateur Radio ingenuity and tracking down and dealing with \n> the low power device(s) in their own neighborhood.\n\n\n>> How's that Luc?  A little more encouraging?\n\nYes in a sense it is another stone in the pound of those who said S band interference is not \nmanageable at to a point they want to TX there!!! Did you know that amateur radio operator here \ncannot interfere with any other RF users and ultimately it is the  amateur radio station who will \nhave to shut down.\n\nI can imagine the free for all when some folks will start to use amplifier on S band.  I play with \na 5 watts model use to boost commercial point to point wi-fi link some will have to start to save \nsome money to buy phones and wi-fi routers for all the street houses around.\n\nWhen we are suffering from 2.4 GHZ interference we are very few to complain but i am not too sure \nwhen we will all transmitting on 2.4 ghz if we will not open a pandora box? As per Bob wb4apr a \nvery week signal can be very disastrous at close range but with a very high ERP we will reach more \nthan our next neighbour...\n\nHere is my microwave oven ridiculous analogy post who is coming back again...\n\n\n\"-\"\nThe medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n\nLuc Leblanc VE2DWE\nWAC basic,CW,Phone,Satellite\nSkype VE2DWE\nwww.qsl.net/ve2dwe \n",
    "attachments": []
}