Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2PYZLNUCA53Y57IVOMC2KPJBJ6QSYQMX/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2PYZLNUCA53Y57IVOMC2KPJBJ6QSYQMX/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAAJiE8OhU1=u0jMyZQSPQ2zVSJOghULhbfOsbGXvHRomyx552Q@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "2PYZLNUCA53Y57IVOMC2KPJBJ6QSYQMX",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/5D54AHMJJKN5TJLZS5SWKWQG7JQQ24C2/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kb2ysi (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "1ea455b723224992934ae02082411602",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/1ea455b723224992934ae02082411602/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Don KB2YSI",
    "subject": "[AMSAT-BB] Re: Popular HT's for satellite work",
    "date": "2021-01-02T18:13:21Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5D54AHMJJKN5TJLZS5SWKWQG7JQQ24C2/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3CAPQSAA2MYECBJCL64YKMOWVBLKI6IQ/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have found using 2 HTs, the best receiver goes on RX, and a filter,\nBLP-200+, MFJ-916B, etc..., to prevent desensitization works very well.\n\nThere is a good case to be made for the IC-2730A, as it is full duplex and\ncan do more than 5w if needed. Cost wise, it is similar to 2 decent HTs, so\nthat is another option too.\n\nOn Sat, Jan 2, 2021, 11:44 Gerald Payton <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Such a simple question but I am a loss finding an answer.  I've searched\n> many of the AMSAT Journals and only found photos of people using HT's.  I\n> looked at \"Getting Started\" which did list some HT's, but I suspect that\n> booklet may be dated.\n>\n> So, which HT's are being commonly used by members NOW??\n>\n> If you wish, to avoid clogging the BB, you may answer directly.\n>\n> 73 & Happy New Year\n> Jerry AB5R\n>\n>\n>\n> -----------------------------------------------------------\n>\n> Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>\n> View archives of this mailing list at\n> https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]\n> To unsubscribe send an email to amsat-bb-leave(a)amsat.org\n> Manage all of your AMSAT-NA mailing list preferences at\n> https://mailman.amsat.org\n\n\n",
    "attachments": [
        {
            "email": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2PYZLNUCA53Y57IVOMC2KPJBJ6QSYQMX/?format=api",
            "counter": 2,
            "name": "attachment.html",
            "content_type": "text/html",
            "encoding": "utf-8",
            "size": 3132,
            "download": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/2PYZLNUCA53Y57IVOMC2KPJBJ6QSYQMX/attachment/2/attachment.html"
        }
    ]
}