Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2V5CW4K5EPBVOUU2NU6QAZRNRXU4NNB6/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "2V5CW4K5EPBVOUU2NU6QAZRNRXU4NNB6",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WAO5JGVTH2D2ZRWKN42MIM5GIBRXHMWB/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "dave (a) g4dpz.me.uk",
        "mailman_id": "4cd84fbc2bba4f1893957af5ac1686f4",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/4cd84fbc2bba4f1893957af5ac1686f4/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "David Johnson",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: TS2000 or FT847 ?",
    "date": "2006-12-27T18:03:39Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P5S6DJOUGMCVNBSUTHCA2T4XI5C76YCX/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GYAYWOP3X4ZJDUWHCEB5PB3KC7C65LZY/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi,\n\nI've used both rigs for sat op's using CAT but the problem with the \n'2000 is the L/O sprog on the SO-50 downlink (436.8) for which you have \nto use a second receiver.\n\n73\n\nDave\n\nJeff Davis, KE9V wrote:\n> Be sure to let him know that Yaesu has discontinued the FT-847. Might  \n> not mean much, but he should have that info before making a decision.\n>\n> 73, Jeff-KE9V\n>\n>\n> On Dec 27, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dave Aitch wrote:\n>\n>   \n>> I introduced a friend to the world of amateur satellites today.\n>>\n>> He was very pleased/impressed to also have a QSO ( Thanks Ib)\n>>\n>> Mike is now trying to decide which transceiver to purchase, as\n>> per the title.\n>>\n>> I have owned/used both, but Mike would prefer some other\n>> opinions too.\n>>\n>> Mike wants and all in one box. No argument.\n>>\n>> What do you think ?\n>>\n>> Any major reasons to choose one over the other ?\n>>\n>> Mike is aware of the annoying UHF harmonics on the TS2000.\n>>\n>> Cheers,\n>>\n>> Dave.\n>> AMSAT UK 5766\n>>     \n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n>   \n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}