Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2ZTPNXCSRNYJ5YTFTV6EW627RKBFAPG6/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2ZTPNXCSRNYJ5YTFTV6EW627RKBFAPG6/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "CABS66G=v53J0_qhbWqA8BFvDArtNkN5EE73mf-SrSOo+icTffg@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "2ZTPNXCSRNYJ5YTFTV6EW627RKBFAPG6",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/2ZTPNXCSRNYJ5YTFTV6EW627RKBFAPG6/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "hfcomnet (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "d4ae97cda30f4d1bb25552270ed29cb2",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/d4ae97cda30f4d1bb25552270ed29cb2/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Glenn Pritchard",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 11, Issue 363",
    "date": "2016-11-14T16:10:09Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZJ7DILAOSDTKVBHIBAES3EQQWEVVYY2V/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi everyone,\n\nI guess it would be time to take those Ten Tec 2510B transverters out of\nthe closet now wouldn't it??\nI have two of them and looking to pick up third for a new ham.\n\nNice to see this bird up.\n\nFor those of you who don't know the 2510 is an analog transverter designed\nto use a 10 meter I.F. on RX to mix the 2 meter downlink to 29 Mhz. It has\na 435 Mhz uplink at, you guessed it, 435 to 435.500.\n\nHave fun, I will.\n\nGlenn, VE6ND, DO20xv\n\nOn Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:59 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to\n>         [email protected]\n>\n> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit\n>         http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to\n>         [email protected]\n>\n> You can reach the person managing the list at\n>         [email protected]\n>\n> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific\n> than \"Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest...\"\n>\n>\n> Today's Topics:\n>\n>    1. EO-79 ([email protected])\n>    2. Tracking EO79 (Sean K.)\n>    3. Re: FunCube 3  EO-79 ([email protected])\n>    4. Re: Tracking EO 79 (Alan)\n>\n>\n> ----------------------------------------------------------------------\n>\n> Message: 1\n> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:45:15 -0700\n> From: <[email protected]>\n> To: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] EO-79\n> Message-ID: <20161112124515.BPKC8.279729.imail@fed1rmwml214>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n>\n> EO-79 very strong but lots of noise on the Sat. Had to correct Doppler\n> through the pass continuously. Heard many stations trying to find\n> themselves but no contacts. My Settings were\n> Uplink  435066\n> DWNLINK  145954\n> Using Satpc32 Cat tuning I was able to control Doppler through pass...\n> 73  JACK-KC7MG\n>\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> Message: 2\n> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:17:26 +0000 (UTC)\n> From: \"Sean K.\" <[email protected]>\n> To: AMSAT BB <[email protected]>\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Tracking EO79\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n>\n> Hi all-\n> A very basic question. If I understand correctly, EO79 will be QRV 27\n> minutes after being in sunlight, for a 25-minute period.\n> What is the best way to determine if EO79 will be audible when it passes\n> overhead? Should I simply aim for daytime passes??Sean Kutzko Amateur Radio\n> KX9X\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> Message: 3\n> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:18:47 -0500\n> From: <[email protected]>\n> To: Keith O'Brien via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]>\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FunCube 3  EO-79\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"utf-8\"\n>\n> I also heard the sat here on Long Island NY with my 3 ele beam fixed at 30\n> deg elevation.\n> I did hear lots of wideband noise in several spots throughout the\n> passband. Never did hear any SSB.\n>\n> Maybe it was cockpit error as Im still a noobie.\n>\n>\n> Frank\n> WA2NDV\n>\n>\n>\n> From: Keith O'Brien via AMSAT-BB\n> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 11:12 AM\n> To: AMSAT-BB\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] FunCube 3 EO-79\n>\n> Saturday morning local was the first chance I had to try out Funcube 3.?\n> Finding my correctuplink frequency required a lot of tuning. I finally\n> located it about 21 KHz up from the\n> published frequency of 435.050.\n>\n> Signal level was good considering my antenna limitations here. Called CQ\n> entire passand heard a lot of signals trying to find themselves, but got no\n> replies this pass.\n> Nice to have another satellite to play with....\n> Keith N4ZQ EL88\n>\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> Message: 4\n> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:57:23 -0600\n> From: Alan <[email protected]>\n> To: \"'Sean K.'\" <[email protected]>\n> Cc: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]>\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Tracking EO 79\n> Message-ID: <[email protected]>\n>\n> Sean,\n>\n> SatPC32 and some other tracking programs have a method of generating a\n> list of times which include when\n> the satellite is eclipsed.  Taking WinListen as an example, you can\n> generated a list, note the times it\n> exits eclipse, calculate with active window, and then compare with your\n> local passes.  It sounds\n> cumbersome, but should only take a couple of minutes per day.\n>\n> 73s,\n>\n> Alan\n> WA4SCA\n>\n>\n> 12.11.2016 E 15:36:00  92.9 -56.9    183.0    612  11398   24 -18  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016 E 15:38:00 101.0 -58.2    188.3    614  11537   23 -25  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016 E 15:40:00 109.4 -59.2    193.6    616  11645   21 -33  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016 E 15:42:00 118.1 -59.9    198.9    617  11721   19 -40  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016   15:44:00 127.0 -60.4    204.2    619  11767   16 -47  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016   15:46:00 136.1 -60.6    209.5    621  11782   13 -55  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016   15:48:00 145.1 -60.5    214.8    623  11767    9 -62  13030\n>  -\n> 12.11.2016   15:50:00 154.1 -60.1    220.1    624  11723    3 -69  13030\n>  -\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> Subject: Digest Footer\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected].\n> AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons\n> worldwide without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n> ------------------------------\n>\n> End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 11, Issue 363\n> *****************************************\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}