Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/34SYDBQ7DKKDWAHH4HNARTY3322EYDYF/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/34SYDBQ7DKKDWAHH4HNARTY3322EYDYF/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "34SYDBQ7DKKDWAHH4HNARTY3322EYDYF", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/SYECFEDG2QGMGDH2ES3NEOBZSHAZFOVP/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "clintbrad4d (a) earthlink.net", "mailman_id": "34e9746137e540a4914cb0d9e0db52fd", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/34e9746137e540a4914cb0d9e0db52fd/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Clint Bradford", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 - After the Change", "date": "2009-12-07T07:01:54Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KNGEJ2JXTA2QYHIY5H3KFRXTK4MBNQ47/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "Art - What you wrote (and correct me if I misinterpreted) is that me - \nand others with mere handheld Yagi antennas - are achieving better \nresults on the FM birds than those with more sophisticated linear \nantennas.\n\nClint\n\n\nOn Dec 6, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Art McBride wrote:\n\n\nClint,\nRotating a linear polarized Yagi in a circularly polarized field should\nresult in less than a few dB of change, no change if the circular \nantenna is\nperfectly circularly polarized. When using a linear antenna ground \neffects\nincluding reflections will cause a larger change. Using circular on both\nends will result in less fading from the ground effects and no change in\nsignal for antenna rotation on the S/C side providing the S/C antenna \nhas a\ngood pointing angle. Losses of 22 +dB are reserved for cross \npolarization of\nantennas H-V and LH to RH.\n\n", "attachments": [] }