Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/35IIKHWVLN7STL53SPIQK6ISVIFD4APK/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "35IIKHWVLN7STL53SPIQK6ISVIFD4APK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/3V3MOF4RB25KWM6OA4CYBPWYFCWKGNQO/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "maggie (a) voicenet.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Margaret Leber",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Future radical satellite designs",
    "date": "2007-07-08T14:05:41Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3V3MOF4RB25KWM6OA4CYBPWYFCWKGNQO/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EZSXBSTT66AWCJKCM7XQMWCQP3RVEN4J/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On 7/8/07, Patrick McGrane <[email protected]> wrote:\n> Hello maggie- I hate it when people snip or take things out of context.\n> Go back to the original entire email to absorb the reason. thanks, patrick\n\nI did read the whole thing.\n\n The challenges to amateur secondary payloads on commercial or\nmilitary spacecraft have been discussed here at length in the past.\n*My* comment was that a standalone bird *designed* without\nbattery-powered transmitters might be an interesting approach.\n\nAs it stands now we have several birds on-orbit designed with larger\nbattery systems (that have subsequently failed) that come up in\nvarious random control system states when they come out of eclipse.\nThese birds only transmit when in sunlight anyway; what if we designed\none that way on purpose? Now *that's* a \"radical satellite design\".\n\nThe payload weight that would have gone to bigger batteries to power\ntransmitters during eclipse could be used for other equipment. A\nsmaller (more reliable? certainly simpler and cheaper)  auxiliary\nbattery system could keep the control systems alive during eclipse. A\nlot of work is being done with ultra-low-power processor chips for\nmobile applications these days.\n\nImagine if AO-40 had used this approach (admittedly not at all in-line\nwith the elaborate something-for-everyone AO-40 design philosophy); it\nmight still be usable. As it is, when the complex power system failed,\nwe lost the whole bird. And the only hope of recovering it is the\noutside chance that it might fail *again*.\n\n--\n73 de Maggie K3XS\nEditor, Phil-Mont Mobile Radio Club Blurb - http://www.phil-mont.org\nElecraft K2 #1641 -- AOPA 925383 -- ARRL 39280\n",
    "attachments": []
}