Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3LLIPY5OQQEXVCSZQEJ52Z3NA2NJ4S7U/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "3LLIPY5OQQEXVCSZQEJ52Z3NA2NJ4S7U",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LJ5RR6LBOZSYLUNUN6IJJ7RTGIBFEYZ6/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "thomasmschaefer (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Thomas Schaefer",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb]  OT: Off-topic posts [Was FM satellites]",
    "date": "2011-07-07T21:15:41Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/K3O6GMLIGQVURWCV5ZHFHCS5J2JPO6N4/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GFGNS3T6W2JDFVN26VFQFW5XB2LL2PYO/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Just a relatively new subscriber question…is this group always so off topic? I understand the source of this post but after a few emails it is clearly nowhere near the original posters comments on why he thinks he can use a satellite versus a cell phone. I have also witnessed many posts that rapidly get into all sorts of things far afield of satellite related things. I have subscribed to many lists and there is usually someone that herds the cats to stay on topic. That seems to be missing here. \n\nOf course, I realize I am welcome to unsubscribe but I do appreciate the nuggets of information actually related to satellites. Maybe I could respectfully suggest that a post like this last one that has devolved to having nothing to do with amateur satellites should have its subject changed to OT:Cell Towers so we all know to ignore the thing.\n\n\nThanks,\n\nTom NY4I\n\nOn Jul 7, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Dee wrote:\n\n> I meant when the towers fall-antennas and everything.. Power was NOT the\n> problem on 9/11..\n> Good luck up North...\n> Dee\n> \n> -----Original Message-----\n> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n> Behalf Of Gordon JC Pearce\n> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:06 PM\n> To: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FM satellites\n> \n> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:05:00 -0400\n> Jim Wright <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n>> When the towers are damaged or the power fails to the cell site, cell \n>> phones don't even make good boat anchors.\n> \n> If the power fails to the cell site, it shouldn't make a difference.\n> They're supposed to have 48 hours of battery backup.\n> \n> Up here at 58°N most cell sites cover a huge area and have no mains power,\n> so they run on a diesel genny that gets filled up once a week or so.\n> \n> Gordon MM0YEQ\n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> \n> \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}