Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3M3MCZB4IWLISTVRWWAI7EUOLQCYBZKE/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3M3MCZB4IWLISTVRWWAI7EUOLQCYBZKE/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "009901c6d2a9$4eb79d40$9bad0d52@wingswme01", "message_id_hash": "3M3MCZB4IWLISTVRWWAI7EUOLQCYBZKE", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/FEBDCQJ3PAKZ6UFGO4JPZNHRAZYXDDMR/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "Felim.M3HIM (a) ntlworld.com", "mailman_id": "de23c7cfd9be4ca296bc289c3113ac5b", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/de23c7cfd9be4ca296bc289c3113ac5b/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Félim Doyle M3HIM", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E", "date": "2006-09-07T18:13:21Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/U7ZG5Y2YGJMTDHQ7OZNVLXBQOBX32Y6W/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "But if you were a true conspiracy theorist your message would not have made\nit this far. Some of mine didn't - and I'm no anarchist\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"David Goncalves\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 4:27 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: S band downlink on P3E\n\n\n> I love these messages; I really can't get enough of them. They really\n> brighten my day.\n> If Luc and AMSAT would bind these into a book, I'd buy it. I'd call it\n\"The\n> AMSAT Anthology of Conspiracy\".\n>\n> Luc, keep on doing what you are doing.\n>\n> Dave W1EUJ\n>\n> > Disappointed to find out that there will not be an S band downlink on\n> > Eagle\n> > >\n> > > Will there be an S band downlink on the P3E bird???\n> > >\n> > > Sure hate having to fork over more money each time a new satellite\ngoes\n> > up\n> > > because previous up/downlinks are not being used anymore....makes me\n> > wish\n> > > for more mode A LEO birds (grin)\n> > >\n> > > 73, Joe W2KJ\n> >\n> > Another bad move by AMSAT-NA... I don't know if they look at their\nfamous\n> > survey about their\n> > members opinions here? Probably not could be some one will wake up from\n> > lethargy at the next\n> > symposium and voices opinions about the maintaining of mode S.\n> >\n> > If AMSAT-NA is building sats in close circle they just have to openly\n> > admitted it even if admission\n> > is not a very spoken word they can at least give some explanations on\n> > their facts who leads them to\n> > scrap mode S?\n> >\n> > Interference? even if they wants to go higher at the time eagle will be\nin\n> > space the higher\n> > frequencies will be as crowded as 2.4 actually. We actually see some\n> > decreased in 2.4 ghz apparatus\n> > as the public always want the most recent goodies even FRS/GMRS are\nmoving\n> > to 5.2 ghz.\n> >\n> > Suggestion: At the next AMSAT-NA 2006 Space Symposium it will\nappropriate\n> > to voices opinions to the\n> > BOD asking them to maintain as planned the mode S.\n> >\n> > Just to pointed out on a 2005 AMSAT-NA Dayton Hamvention Jim Sanford\n> > WB4GCS made a presentation on\n> > eagle project and he said i quote \" S band will be our bread and butter\non\n> > the downlink\" a\n> > prototype of L/S and C/S where planned for the 2005 Symposium at that\n> > time.\n> >\n> > He also mention that the C/C project in on a bleeding edge technology\n> > (read experimental) and they\n> > where not too sure if they will even be able to make it.\n> >\n> > Why the C/C band project? he let go this \" this will permit some folks\nto\n> > use it from their\n> > balcony\" the cat goes out the bag AGAIN the same ECHO mindings are\n> > resurecting...The guy with an HT\n> > will be able to make it without using a huge antenna!\n> >\n> > We will never be able to get rid of this obsession and you know now why\n> > they want to move up? The\n> > guy who live on a balcony is living in an apartment complex where S band\n> > in unusable. Here is why\n> > the C/C project come up. How many actual sat operator are living in\n> > apartments? the majority of\n> > some of them?\n> >\n> > Here is the whole logics behind this mode S scrapping. If you read a bit\n> > behind the lines you will\n> > see he speak about P3E where mode S will be present and he confirm some\n> > collaboration between both\n> > teams. He also say some of the Eagle builders are funding their own\n> > project. From this since 2005\n> > we can only see the builders behind the C/C project pushing so hard to a\n> > point to get the money\n> > previously intended for the 2 S mode TX redirected to their C/C project.\n> >\n> > Who is driving AMSAT-NA an hollow BOD? an hollow president? Or a third\n> > builders manipulating wing\n> > who blackmail the BOD?\n> >\n> > None of them? I let the conclusion yours!\n> >\n> > P.S.To the BOD its not the best way to attract new members or convince\n> > those who leave to rejoin!\n> >\n> > \"-\"\n> > The medium is the message...The content is the audience...;)\n> >\n> > Luc Leblanc VE2DWE\n> > Skype VE2DWE\n> > www.qsl.net/ve2dwe\n> > Former AMSAT-NA coordonnator and member.\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\nprogram!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n>\n>\n>\n> -- \n> David Goncalves\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n", "attachments": [] }