Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3QOQYDGB6EHEBDPMRFDDQYIYXO4COUX5/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3QOQYDGB6EHEBDPMRFDDQYIYXO4COUX5/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "3QOQYDGB6EHEBDPMRFDDQYIYXO4COUX5",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RDYLNWN7U2WHHRP6LRDJZ4VVTHD22WYX/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Tony Langdon",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Best HT's for sats?",
    "date": "2008-04-04T04:30:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KSPEDYLRWDLTJWQ7BP72SOKXQB7GHILC/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "At 12:51 PM 4/4/2008, Mark Vandewettering wrote:\n\n>I've been using a TH-D7A and an Arrow antenna.  Works\n>great, no problem with desense, and it's fun to use\n>the APRS stuff to bounce packets off ISS, Go-32 and NO-44.\n>It's not the most glamorous, but it works very well for\n>satellites, and I have no hesitation in recommending it\n>for that.\n\nI've always gone the 2 HT route, mainly because I have never owned a \nfull duplex capable HT.  I'm another who is a big believer in full \nduplex operation on the sats.  It gives you a LOT more insight into \nwhat's happening on the bird.  I can operate without full duplex, but \nI prefer not to.\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}