Email Detail
Show an email
GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3QOQYDGB6EHEBDPMRFDDQYIYXO4COUX5/?format=api
{ "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3QOQYDGB6EHEBDPMRFDDQYIYXO4COUX5/?format=api", "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api", "message_id": "[email protected]", "message_id_hash": "3QOQYDGB6EHEBDPMRFDDQYIYXO4COUX5", "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RDYLNWN7U2WHHRP6LRDJZ4VVTHD22WYX/?format=api", "sender": { "address": "vk3jed (a) gmail.com", "mailman_id": "e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655", "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e049fcabdd4648088cd7ce227ab7c655/emails/?format=api" }, "sender_name": "Tony Langdon", "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Best HT's for sats?", "date": "2008-04-04T04:30:57Z", "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KSPEDYLRWDLTJWQ7BP72SOKXQB7GHILC/?format=api", "children": [], "votes": { "likes": 0, "dislikes": 0, "status": "neutral" }, "content": "At 12:51 PM 4/4/2008, Mark Vandewettering wrote:\n\n>I've been using a TH-D7A and an Arrow antenna. Works\n>great, no problem with desense, and it's fun to use\n>the APRS stuff to bounce packets off ISS, Go-32 and NO-44.\n>It's not the most glamorous, but it works very well for\n>satellites, and I have no hesitation in recommending it\n>for that.\n\nI've always gone the 2 HT route, mainly because I have never owned a \nfull duplex capable HT. I'm another who is a big believer in full \nduplex operation on the sats. It gives you a LOT more insight into \nwhat's happening on the bird. I can operate without full duplex, but \nI prefer not to.\n\n73 de VK3JED\nhttp://vkradio.com\n\n", "attachments": [] }