Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3RPJEV3NO3CODFELFOCWRCWL3KSRPRD5/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "3RPJEV3NO3CODFELFOCWRCWL3KSRPRD5",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/3OC2LV37Q5KSM2URKKDKZUPL5RV6V2XH/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "koos (a) kzdoos.xs4all.nl",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Koos van den Hout",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50 QSO's",
    "date": "2014-08-03T19:59:55Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3OC2LV37Q5KSM2URKKDKZUPL5RV6V2XH/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/DLM5KOL2GID27SYKSL5SF3AJ2G54SGNL/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Quoting John Belstner who wrote on Sun 2014-08-03 at 12:18:\n\n> I heard lots of new calls on SO-50 today and I really wanted to give them a shout back and say welcome.\n> Unfortunately, that's about all I heard was a bunch of folks throwing their call sign out.\n\nI have avoided reporting from the European side of working SO-50 for a\nwhile, but this afternoon I heard multiple good QSO's and I could\nunderstand at least one callsign (M0SAT). I tried answering that callsign\n2 times but no luck.\n\nIt was as busy as could be expected on a Sunday afternoon, but to me it\nsounded like everyone was acting fine and those who got across had nice and\nshort QSOs (callsigns, signal, location).\n\n> On a more serious note, try to hear the downlink first before transmitting.  It reduces QRM and greatly increases your chances of making a QSO!\n\nYou could miss your answer, the SO-50 downlink shift seems to me at the\nmoment bigger than the input width of a normal FM amateur receiver. If I\nlet gpredict do all the tuning from the specified downlink frequency I hear\nnothing. Tune around a bit and I find it and it's busy.\n\nI just noted\nhttp://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/satellite/amateur-radio-satellites/so-50/\nsuggests not correcting for doppler shift on the 2M uplink. Any opinions on\nthat?\n\n                                              Koos van den Hout PD4KH\n\n-- \nKoos van den Hout,           PGP keyid DSS/1024 0xF0D7C263 via keyservers\[email protected]\n                                Visit the site about books with reviews\nhttp://idefix.net/                      http://www.virtualbookcase.com/\n",
    "attachments": []
}