Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3S36S7DMKOQ6FEJYDXNBIHEI6TD2YITF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAPOM0dk4H3AVKGeuXv8AOhwAC_fLiS4vo6HVauV4hFomC0UkWA@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "3S36S7DMKOQ6FEJYDXNBIHEI6TD2YITF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/CMABMPL7RLQH7LSTYGOUAFUWXFPME6HS/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ve3hls (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "0e3ed8a6a65a4da9a1251cd5295de092",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/0e3ed8a6a65a4da9a1251cd5295de092/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Kenneth P Alexander",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] suitable omni antenna for FM sats?",
    "date": "2019-05-11T21:02:09Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CMABMPL7RLQH7LSTYGOUAFUWXFPME6HS/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "...and once they announce their presence, a station from DP79 will attract\na lot of attention!\n\nKen (VE3HLS)\nSo Phisai, Thailand\nBlog:  bueng-ken.com\n\nOn Sun, May 12, 2019, 03:13 John Kludt via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]>\nwrote:\n\n> Ron,\n>\n> Everything Jeff days is true.  But some of us live in covenant restricted\n> settings and an omni is much easier to sneak in under the radar.  I have\n> switched back and forth between eggbeaters and various verticals.  So far\n> 88 grids.  Three points:\n>\n> 1) Pay attention to ERP.  You are going to need a little more uplink power\n> to make up for the lack of Tx antenna gain.\n> 2) Always, always use a preamp at the antenna on 435 down links\n> 3) Be patient.  This is a compromise solution and you are not going to\n> knock them down every pass.\n>\n> If it is all you can do go ahead.  Better to be on the air working the\n> birds as best you can than doing nothing at all.\n>\n> John\n>\n> Sent from my Verizon Motorola Smartphone\n> On May 11, 2019 00:34, Jeff Moore via AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> wrote:\n> >\n> > As was stated multiple times in a very recent thread - omnis for sat\n> work\n> > are a poor compromise!!    Even a small beam at a 15-degree angle will\n> > generally blow most omnis off the roof! Even better would be a pair of\n> > beams (one for uplink, one for downlink) on an azimuth/elevation rotor!\n> > But handheld can work almost as good!!\n> >\n> > 7   3\n> > Jeff Moore   ---   KE7ACY\n> > CN94\n> >\n> >\n> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:08 PM Ron VE8RT via AMSAT-BB <\n> [email protected]>\n> > wrote:\n> >\n> > >    We have a newly licenced amateur in DP79.  Because they fell a few\n> > > points of getting their Basic with Honours they do not have HF\n> > > privileges, their only way to communicate with the outside world is\n> via\n> > > satellite.  Anticipating this possible outcome, that they may not get\n> > > access to the HF bands, I sent them a hard copy, (no home internet,\n> and\n> > > its slow and expensive there if you do have it), of the current copy\n> of\n> > > \"Getting Started with Amateur Satellites\".  As we're heading into the\n> > > time of year to do any outside work, the most pressing question is\n> what\n> > > is the best compromise antenna for a base station.   Keeping in mind\n> > > their location, in order to work anyone they'll have to get into the\n> > > satellites while the satellite is close to their horizon, otherwise\n> the\n> > > satellite footprint will not cover areas with any satellite operators.\n> > >\n> > >    Ron VE8RT in DP22\n> > >\n> > > --\n> > > Ron VE8RT <[email protected]>\n> > > _______________________________________________\n> > > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions\n> > > expressed\n> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views\n> of\n> > > AMSAT-NA.\n> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> > >\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n> Opinions expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n> program!\n> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}