Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3SEHPOIQAZBYKQQZSFBSK3D7KHX2QX4O/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3SEHPOIQAZBYKQQZSFBSK3D7KHX2QX4O/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "3SEHPOIQAZBYKQQZSFBSK3D7KHX2QX4O",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/AJQPVSBJ42NALYYS4VAUW5XAO5NQBWHO/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "va3kkz (a) amsat.org",
        "mailman_id": "2ea1c3202486498a9dc00de67dcdc644",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/2ea1c3202486498a9dc00de67dcdc644/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Daniel Kekez",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: ITAR is interesting to me",
    "date": "2009-10-19T04:11:14Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PEP2MNF4AOWFFYTFDEENVL7Z2HQI3GDA/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/XB7OLWCEHMWCYWLVBROSMFKCUVVQAY5Y/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Bruce Robertson wrote:\n>  Given that AMSAT-NA is by definition a collaboration between amateurs\n> on both sides of the US/Canada border, do we have a clear idea where\n> ITAR stands with respect to Canadian collaborators? I know that in\n> 1999 the previous exemption was revoked, but that in 2001 there were\n> some changes again.\n\nTo the best of my knowledge, Canada holds no special status with regard\nto ITAR.\n\nConsider ITAR to be a \"goods and information diode\": Canada can sell\nspace technology to an American company and can provide information.\nHowever, the American company cannot describe their application in\ndetail or send any information North of the border without a Technical\nAssistance Agreement in place between the particular organizations. And\nUS export permits are needed to send space technology to Canada.\n\nFurthermore, if a Canadian company wishes to use US technology on a\nCanadian satellite and then launch with foreign launcher, the country\nfrom which the launch takes place must also be specified (and approved)\non the US Export Permit. The US State department must be satisfied that\nall precautions are being taken to protect the technology when it is in\na foreign country.\n\nCanada does have its own restrictions for space technology under the\nControlled Goods Program legislated by the Defence Production Act. And\nexport permits are needed when sending space technology outside of the\ncountry. The process, however, is far less onerous than ITAR. Details on\nthe Canadian system can be found at\nhttp://www.ssi-iss.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/dmc-cgd/apropos-about/apercu-overview-eng.html\n\n73,\n-Daniel, VA3KKZ\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}