Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3SWBMRO2SFDWET45V332IRNU7R5VQTJY/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "001301c86b01$6d9e2840$6432a8c0@LAPTOP9",
    "message_id_hash": "3SWBMRO2SFDWET45V332IRNU7R5VQTJY",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/5JEUS27NIPCOAURMLM2E3FJZLZQEG7FE/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "howard (a) howardlong.com",
        "mailman_id": "82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/82a1d3d58c6f48898b755d208f81930e/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Howard Long",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Australian Reciprocal Licensing Changes",
    "date": "2008-02-09T09:52:04Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Z5IIBUIBR6ZFMTNG3CFMS7MVQGIVH5O6/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Nate\n\n> > Among the changes they now permit the Encoding, for the purpose of \n> > Obscuring the meaning, of control signals for Amateur Satellites or \n> > unattended stations.\n>\n> All I have to say to this is FINALLY...\n>\n> > Now, signals encoded for the purpose of obscuring the meaning may be \n> > used for controlling a satellite or an unattended amateur stations or \n> > in emergency operations.\n>\n> Another VERY important piece of this:  Can also be used for emergency \n> operations TRAINING.  (Train like you're going to fight... so to speak.)\n\nI am not sure what the purpose of obscuring the meaning is. For command and\ncontrol, is a digital signature not sufficient? Implemented with a\ncontinually changing challenge-response combined with a private key, this\nwould prevent the resending of recorded commands doing damage.\n\nThe only reason I can see for encryption is to protect NPPI data during\nemergencies, but I don't understand why it's needed for command and control.\n\nOf course, there may be another reason for obsuring the meaning that I've\nmissed!\n\n73, Howard G6LVB\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}