Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3T3AWFFPTKH3EJSZCXURYSITWKRJDXED/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "50F190AF5FAB46AE87DD107334EEBDA6@parents",
    "message_id_hash": "3T3AWFFPTKH3EJSZCXURYSITWKRJDXED",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WQBBT4PNP7LKOLXRMECOEO3NVFW2GVLT/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka3hsw (a) att.net",
        "mailman_id": "afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "George Henry",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: TubeSats - DIY Satellites",
    "date": "2010-08-09T23:29:27Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4DZQXIXD26QROHNYM3KJVCVZ3HWKLHD3/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6N2L3QQDV63HRHX6YQQ6Z7APXAYUIN7V/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "On a sort-of-positive note, Interorbital Systems' website shows that they \ncurrently have an open CubeSat slot on their December launch, at only \n$12,500.  Unfortunately, it is only to a 310 kM orbit.  A future launch will \ncarry payloads to 600 kM.  No price listed for that launch yet...\n\n\nGeorge, KA3HSW\n\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Lee McLamb\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:17 PM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: TubeSats - DIY Satellites\n\n\n> All satellites must be operated as part of a licensed service.  To the \n> best of\n> my knowledge there is no equivalent to the FCC's Part 15 for satellite\n> operations.  Further since it is required that all satellites have the\n> capability of being commanded off, two-way communication is also always\n> required.  It is a mistake I see frequently that people think that local \n> rules\n> regarding low power RF emitters can be applied to a project with \n> international\n> implications like a satellite.\n>\n>\n> 73,\n> Lee-KU4OS\n>\n> On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:22:58 pm George Henry wrote:\n>> Quote:  \"If the your (sic) TubeSat application does not require two-way\n>> communications, a radio operator's license is not required\"\n>>\n>>\n>> Downlink frequencies available:  amateur 433 MHz 500 mW, \"license-free\" \n>> 902\n>> - 928 MHz or 2.400 - 2.4835 GHz, 100 mW - 1000 mW \"selectable\"\n>>\n>> Last I knew, 902 - 928 MHz had no US or international allocation\n>> for satellite downlink use, the amateur downlink frequency conflicts with\n>> the US band plan (the launch company is US-based), and isn't the\n>> space-to-earth allocation at 2400 - 2483.5 ONLY for amateur radio\n>> satellites?\n>>\n>>\n>> George, KA3HSW\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}