Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/42UVNWVLMHLZALXOOARF7DVK7N3FTIPP/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "42UVNWVLMHLZALXOOARF7DVK7N3FTIPP",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MWJSTAA3K2RMKW7USWGCYC32FASLZ6PC/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "rafavaldez (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Rafael Valdez G.",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Arrow Antennas",
    "date": "2009-08-17T19:30:28Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MWJSTAA3K2RMKW7USWGCYC32FASLZ6PC/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/75XQBDYWQDQ6UZH6NUBEKE4ACAFTJG5X/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nDoes Arrow antenna needs more endoresement than these two???....\n\n \n\nI personally like Elk for its less bulky design but Arrow is definetely a winner....\n\n \n\n73\n\n\n\n\nRafael Valdez Jr.\nXE2RV @ DM41mh\n10-10 52716\nVUCC Sat #164\n \nhttp://sat-xe.blogspot.com\n \n \nEX-XE2PWF\n \n \n \nP Before printing, please think about your responsibility and commitment with the ENVIRONMENT. \nAntes de Imprimir, piensa entu responsabilidad y compromiso con el MEDIO AMBIENTE\n \n\n\n \n\n> To: [email protected]\n> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:12:19 -0800\n> From: [email protected]\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow Antennas\n> \n> \n> AMEN ! \n> \n> I have used my Arrow right out of the box (bag), with a store-bought\n> duplexer and it works great! No mods necessary. Thousands of QSO's\n> on my trips around the country on AO-27, UO-14, SO-50, etc. \n> \n> I note that many of the messages I see on this subject are from people\n> I've\n> never heard on any satellite. Strange. \n> \n> 73\n> John K6YK\n> SAT VUCC #10, 800+ grids confirmed\n> SAT WAS #200\n> \n> \n> --------- Forwarded message ----------\n> From: \"RONALD CADE\" <w6zq_\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:28:43 -0700\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arrow Antennas\n> \n> Gentlemen,\n> \n> If you want to see some improvement from the Arrow antenna, leave it's\n> physical dimensions alone and remove the diplexer in the handle, throw it\n> away and replace it with one of my designs. I won't get into any of the\n> design details however having a device with adjustable capacitors and\n> wire wound inductors makes a world of difference.\n> I have been using this antenna since it arrived on the market with great\n> success. Most of my activity has been in California, Arizona and the\n> Hawaiian Islands. I would not take any other antenna with me on my trips\n> away from home.\n> As Clint mentioned, there is a significant difference in the signal\n> strength from the sats as I have to rotate my antenna at least 45 degrees\n> during a pass. \n> \n> Ron, W6ZQ\n> SAT VUCC #99, 500+ grids confirmed\n> SAT WAS\n> Arrow + Icom ICw32\n> \n> \n> \n> ____________________________________________________________\n> Click here for fast, safe, easy money transfers.\n> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTOTyad2VyE2lm1KsWbeHeiRwMj2JA6FRJ2GAi9gzyFTTktD1juRSA/\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n_________________________________________________________________\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}