Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/45YUALU4454DZETE2K6ODOCTB3YP62IW/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "45YUALU4454DZETE2K6ODOCTB3YP62IW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/PNC6XBNNP4GUPWUA3QIQA25OZS6YAR3R/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com",
        "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "w4upd",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: IC910",
    "date": "2009-11-28T20:04:30Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/PNC6XBNNP4GUPWUA3QIQA25OZS6YAR3R/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I tried working AO-51 the last couple of days on !.2Ghz, but no luck. I \nthought I heard myself a couple of times but sure. There was more \nactivity than I expected to hear and I noticed that although the \ntransponder signal was good as usual, the signals coming through were \nlower from those I have heard using the UHF uplink when on. I was using \nthe usual 435.300 downlink as I do not have my stuff for 2.3Ghz put \ntogether yet.\n\nMy attempts to work AO-51 was an experiment which I really didn't expect \nto work as I have about 50 feet of 9913 which is actually in three \nsections to allow it to reach the rig (IC-910) with each section being \nspliced with a \"N\" barrel connector. Each of those induces a fair amount \nof lose, especially at 1.2ghz. Next, I had that running to a general \npurpose MFJ discone that runs from 50mhz - 1.3Ghz. So as I figure it, I \nprobably had about .5 watts ERP to AO-51 at best, hi!\n\nI plan on building a reasonable 1.2Ghz, maybe the loop one shown in the \nbooks as they appear to work well. I may look at getting or making a 100 \nwatt (2C39) amplifier. However, I did hear a couple of portables on the \npass, so I suspect a reasonable antenna will work wonders. Not sure but \nI do not think the sat antennas will not do much good without \nconsiderable modifications. By the time you do that you might as well \nmake one from scratch. They're not that difficult to make. Since I'm new \nto the 1.2Ghz operation, you might want to solicit from others that have \nmore to contribute than I do.\n\nReid, W4UPD\n\n\nJack Barbera wrote:\n> Thanks everyone for your input on adding a UX910 1200mhz band to my IC 910. \n> Santa came early.will be using LMR-600 as the run is under 100 ' and I have it. Next will be looking for an antenna.Have a number of sat T.V antennas and looking into possibly using the reflector and looking for a kit. Does this make sense or should I just go for a complete antenna?\n> ThanksJack WA1ZDV \n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>\n>\n> No virus found in this incoming message.\n> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com \n> Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.85/2532 - Release Date: 11/28/09 02:45:00\n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}