Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4AHHCRG67GL37TAXIUB5F7DK7JXOTXZH/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4AHHCRG67GL37TAXIUB5F7DK7JXOTXZH",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com",
        "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "w4upd",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T14:02:10Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IC7LCHA5EOTBT2QXJPK454AMYKXQQVMY/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Although I have owned Kenwood equipment (and still have the TS711/811 \npair) I purchased an Icom IC-910 and have been very happy with it. I \nhave a few friends with the TS2000 and although it is a nice rig, I \nfound the IC-910 to be more sensitive to weak signals related to \nsatellites and have at times received the signals without using my \npreamp. The TS2000 also have some birdies in the satellite frequencies \nthat can be annoying and this problem has not nor do they plan on fixing.\n\nIf you do not have a rig yet and wish a unit that covers HF/VHF/UHF than \nthis may be the unit. Frankly, I don't like having all my eggs in one \nbasket in the event the rig fails, you lose it all. You can get other \nrigs cheaper that cover HF/VHF/UHF that are not satellite rigs at \naffordable prices and still get the Icom IC-910 which is what I did. \nAlso, if you want to add 1.2Ghz it is less than a 5 minute project on \nthe IC-910. The TS2000 is a bit more time consuming and difficult.\n\nJust my two cents.\n\nReid, W4UPD\n\n\nTom wrote:\n> I plan to purchase a new home transceiver in the next few months and I've\n> narrowed my choices between a 910H and a TS2000. Thinking only of satellite\n> operation (ignoring the HF capability of the TS2000), is there a general\n> preference in the Amsat community of one over the other? Reasons?\n>  \n> Thanks for your opinions.\n> Tom, KØTW\n>  \n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}