Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4B3AM42EZQQO2UH36NNHO7MGYRTUYCAW/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4B3AM42EZQQO2UH36NNHO7MGYRTUYCAW",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/4B3AM42EZQQO2UH36NNHO7MGYRTUYCAW/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "sco (a) sco-inc.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "[email protected]",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VQlog and LoTW",
    "date": "2007-04-17T21:14:48Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MXCUZ23B27SDOSOHLKGVUGV4EOQ75L7H/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nFor myself I use eQSL and have tried LOTW once or twice. LOTW in my \nopinion is not user friendly.\n\nLes\n\nAt 05:07 PM 4/17/2007, you wrote:\n>Quoting [email protected]:\n>\n> >\n> > LW4.5 exports ADIF logs that eQSL is ok with. We are working on a new\n> > scoQSL program for uploading logs to eQSL and LOTW.\n> >\n> > Les W4SCO\n> > www.logwindow.com\n> > www.myweblinks.cc\n> >\n> >\n> > At 03:34 PM 4/17/2007, you wrote:\n> > >All,\n> > >I'm considering moving my VHF/Sat logs to VQlog, because DX4WIN\n> > >isn't really built for the oddities of sat logging.  Especially the\n> > >super-oddities of satellites and LoTW.\n> > >Can anyone tell me if VQLog generates an ADIF log for satellite QSOs\n> > >that LoTW likes, without any user post-processing?  Right now I have\n> > >to hand-edit DX4WIN output to include things like satellite name etc.\n> > >Thanks,\n> > >--\n> > >Scott Townley NX7U\n> > >Gilbert, AZ  DM43di\n>\n>I use VQlog and LoTW for satellite contacts, and yes, in general, they get\n>along nicely. I'm disappointed in the number of satellite QSLs generated by\n>LoTW, though. It seems the AMSAT community isn't too keen on LoTW yet.\n>\n>73, VE9QRP\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}