Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4HJL3VSTJSH3TBVMU464XRTS4YXRBL4F/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4HJL3VSTJSH3TBVMU464XRTS4YXRBL4F",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WAHPQ47CIBS2FRZ6OISN46PK52WLWDSV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w4as (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Sebastian",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VHF UHF Rig",
    "date": "2008-07-25T02:23:30Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/Q4TVBF2EO4MCK7AFR2PDNI5DBMXS4RZ7/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FTGNWWDBZFGYZVQQOOBP5CJDRYLRTHE4/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Oh boy, and here I just bought a used dual band mobile on the cheap  \n(no transmit) to take care of the birdy problem.\n\nDo you have any idea why the birdy would show up on a different  \nradio?  Could it be a matter of a lack of shielding?  It just doesn't  \nmake any sense to me why a different rig would get that interference  \non receive, and even when using a different antenna.\n\nOthers have suggested using a preamp on 440, and turning off the  \n2000's internal preamp and lowering the rf gain, therefore using the  \npreamp to get rid of most of the birdy.\n\nBut I guess I'll find out for sure when my other rig gets here.\n\n73 de W4AS\nSebastian\n\nOn Jul 24, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote:\n\n> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Mike Miller <[email protected]>  \n> wrote:\n>> Thinking about selling 847.....Which rig is best for  \n>> satellite..work.?\n>>\n>> ICOM 910 H\n>> Kenwood 2000\n>>\n>> opinions ....your 2 cents\n>\n> I own a TS-2000. The birdie problem on SO-50 and AO-27 is quite real,\n> and there is no fix I know of. I find that the birdie is so bad that\n> even if I use a different receiver on UHF, I pick up the birdie on it\n> as well! So it is a worse radio regarding satellite work than the ICOM\n> if you care to work these birds.  However, if you consider the fact\n> that a fine HF radio is thrown in at no extra cost, that there is\n> continuously adjustable filtering also at no cost, you might prefer\n> that trade-off. I'm reasonably pleased with mine.\n>\n> However, if money were no issue, I would get the ICOM for satellite\n> work and a different HF radio with even better characteristics.\n>\n> HTH,\n>\n> 73, Bruce\n> VE9QRP\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}