Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4JMD6DEW4KVUCARPT4GUGAJA2PZ4TTEF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "MWHPR01MB26538BFDC133FCEA7DD2EE44CA480@MWHPR01MB2653.prod.exchangelabs.com",
    "message_id_hash": "4JMD6DEW4KVUCARPT4GUGAJA2PZ4TTEF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/R5A74XCPKHEHGLBDRJOKR6MIEXPP6KDA/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "devin (a) thecabal.org",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Devin L. Ganger",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)",
    "date": "2018-06-27T23:09:11Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3XF7REERTQFEFCUNDHFUGRT7YNQGY2PM/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "7.3.7.1 is a clarification of 7.3.7 which is about *scoring*.\r\n\r\n\r\n--\r\nDevin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)\r\nemail: [email protected]\r\nweb: Devin on Earth\r\ncell: +1 425.239.2575\r\n\r\n> -----Original Message-----\r\n> From: AMSAT-BB <[email protected]> On Behalf Of\r\n> JamesDuffey\r\n> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:50 AM\r\n> To: Matthew Stevens <[email protected]>\r\n> Cc: amsat-bb <[email protected]>; Bruce <[email protected]>\r\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)\r\n> \r\n> To me this rule:\r\n> \r\n> “7.3.7.1 Stations are limited to one (1) completed QSO on any single channel\r\n> FM satellite.”\r\n> \r\n> Precludes stations from making more than one QSO on a FM bird.\r\n> \r\n> I suppose that this is subject to interpretation, but to me that the intent of\r\n> the rule is to make the FM satellites available to more people by rationing\r\n> QSOes to one per bird. Making more than a single QSO and not scoring them\r\n> or not entering them into the log does not make the satellite available to\r\n> more operators and seems to fly in the face of the rule. I understand why\r\n> people do it, and under some circumstances it may be a good idea, but to me\r\n> it is against the rule.\r\n> \r\n> Of course someone could ask the ARRL Contest Manager if this practice is OK,\r\n> but remember the old adage of not asking questions you don’t really want to\r\n> know the answer to. - Duffey KK6MC\r\n> \r\n> James Duffey KK6MC\r\n> Cedar Crest NM\r\n> \r\n> > On Jun 27, 2018, at 05:26, Matthew Stevens <[email protected]>\r\n> wrote:\r\n> >\r\n> > Neither rule prevents you from making more than one FM contact. Both\r\n> > rules just prohibit you from SCORING more than one FM contact.\r\n> >\r\n> > 73\r\n> >\r\n> > - Matthew nj4y\r\n> >\r\n> >\r\n> >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:21 AM, George Henry <[email protected]>\r\n> wrote:\r\n> >> To have an AMSAT rule that directly conflicts with the ARRL\r\n> >> one-and-done rule is ridiculous.\r\n> >>\r\n> >>\r\n> >> George, KA3HSW\r\n> >>\r\n> >>\r\n> >> -----Original Message-----\r\n> >> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of\r\n> Bruce\r\n> >> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 11:53 AM\r\n> >> To: [email protected]\r\n> >> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)\r\n> >>\r\n> >> In the AMSAT rules we do state, because someone asked about it, you\r\n> >> can be a net control type station and work every station you want.\r\n> >> You would only be able to score one contact yourself but had given\r\n> >> many out to those trying to make the 100 point satellite bonus.\r\n> >>\r\n> >> We still feel by limiting to one FM contact that if you worked\r\n> >> someone and both of you leave the bird, two more stations can work\r\n> >> each other thereby maximazing the number of possible contacts on the\r\n> >> satellite during a single pass.\r\n> >>\r\n> >> 73...bruce\r\n> >>\r\n> >>\r\n> >> _______________________________________________\r\n> >> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum\r\n> available\r\n> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\r\n> >> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the\r\n> official views of AMSAT-NA.\r\n> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\r\n> program!\r\n> >> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\r\n> > _______________________________________________\r\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum\r\n> available\r\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\r\n> > Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the\r\n> official views of AMSAT-NA.\r\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\r\n> program!\r\n> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\r\n> \r\n> _______________________________________________\r\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\r\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\r\n> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views\r\n> of AMSAT-NA.\r\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\r\n> program!\r\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\r\n",
    "attachments": []
}