Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4LU3JAPMU27CACUCGJNNXSJYKPNR3CIO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4LU3JAPMU27CACUCGJNNXSJYKPNR3CIO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/TRHUKLHNEQN4XPUEU6ZKLAK7OSLLZGN3/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com",
        "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "w4upd",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T21:57:42Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/B2EGNEEFJC5KJKLVAAEK5DGKQXATWXKV/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I am amazed at how many people take things stated out of context on this \nreflector. I never said that any of the arrays would not work due to \nbeing too narrow for satellite work. An individual asked about the \nproblem they were having hearing the satellites and it was stated that \nif none of the other suggestions worked to consider that the arrays they \nare using are pointed correctly in the correct direction of the \nsatellite. Pointing being off, the nulls could easily block the \nsatellite's reception. The larger the array the more this might be \nevident. The larger the array, stacked arrays and even dish antennas, \npointing becomes a bit more critical.\n\nReid, W4UPD\n\nJohn Geiger wrote:\n> I have used a Cushcraft 13B2 (13 elements) on 2m and a Cushcraft 719B (19 elements) on 70cm on the satellites with no problem.  Didn't experience either as being too narrow beamwidth for sat use.\n>\n> 73s John AA5JG\n>\n> --- On Mon, 11/30/09, wrb <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>   \n>> From: wrb <[email protected]>\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000\n>> To: [email protected]\n>> Cc: [email protected]\n>> Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 2:11 PM\n>> Your antenna plan is not bad, you\n>> just to make sure that their pointing \n>> (direction) are reasonably accurate. The larger the array,\n>> the higher \n>> the gain, the more narrow the beam width. The 11 element\n>> array pointing \n>> comment was just to be sure that that individual was\n>> reasonably close to \n>> the direction of the bird. Off pointed and he could be\n>> experiencing the \n>> problem he is seeing of not hearing the bird(s). If was\n>> meant only as \n>> another suggestion to look at.\n>>\n>> When I get my rotator fixed, I plan on putting the KLM two\n>> meter 22 \n>> element and 70 cm 40 element arrays back up. They worked\n>> extremely well \n>> on AO-7 and the HEOs that once circled the heavens.\n>>\n>> Reid, W4UPD\n>>\n>>\n>> Tom wrote:\n>>     \n>>> Thanks for all of the great information. Since both\n>>>       \n>> the TS2000 and IC910H\n>>     \n>>> have been around a while I believe that most of their\n>>>       \n>> 'problems' have been\n>>     \n>>> at least discovered. So, in that respect, I'm leaning\n>>>       \n>> away from the \"still\n>>     \n>>> to be debugged\" IC-9100. Also new rigs always are\n>>>       \n>> priced high in the\n>>     \n>>> beginning of their life, as we all know. I know that\n>>>       \n>> some of the ham dealers\n>>     \n>>> are offering \"Closeout\" prices on the 910H but I\n>>>       \n>> didn't see much difference\n>>     \n>>> from previous pricing. \n>>>\n>>> Not to prolong this thread but Jerry's append (below)\n>>>       \n>> brings up another\n>>     \n>>> question. How much antenna is \"too much\" for satellite\n>>>       \n>> operation. Someone\n>>     \n>>> earlier mentioned that an 11 element yagi might have a\n>>>       \n>> beam width too narrow\n>>     \n>>> to closely follow an LEO bird. I had planned on using\n>>>       \n>> yagis with 13 elements\n>>     \n>>> on 2M and 18 els on 70cm. Is that a bad plan?\n>>>\n>>> Thanks again.\n>>> Tom, KØTW\n>>>\n>>>    \n>>>       \n>>>> Hi; I have owned the Ft-736 R and the Ft-847,\n>>>>         \n>> which I am using now.\n>>     \n>>>>             No matter\n>>>>         \n>> which rig you decide to buy the most important thing\n>>     \n>>>>            is\n>>>>         \n>> the antenna system.\n>>     \n>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>>     \n>>>>\n>>>>         \n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}