Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4NSO5UYDB2O23ONXQBQ5LK4HJXGKAIGT/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4NSO5UYDB2O23ONXQBQ5LK4HJXGKAIGT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GNTZWDQRXRV56XNDVUEYU5DTM5B3BUF7/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "lennartkieft (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Lennart Kieft",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] TH-F6A",
    "date": "2015-02-19T20:51:23Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HJUBCHX5JHK5P7Y74MXPNBSNJ5IVQ6I3/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Good evening Lee,\nI've used my TH-F7E ( Europe version without 220) now on several occasions for receiving, for me it worked perfect, but as i do rx only (so far) i can't tell you how it will react on a 20w signal.\nthe only con i have is that the tune knob is quit small, and if you use small tuning steps like me you will have to turn a lot ;-) but this is more a comfort issue than a real problem.\nGood luck,\n'73 LennartPD5LKM/MM\n \n\n> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:27:27 -0600\n> From: [email protected]\n> To: [email protected]\n> CC: [email protected]\n> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] TH-F6A\n> \n> I have used this one for many years.  As long as there is some antenna\n> separation, I wouldnt expect much if any desense.\n> \n> Ron\n> \n> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Lee Ernstrom <[email protected]>\n> wrote:\n> \n> > GA satellite goo-roos.  Today I was scanning the HRO catalogue looking for\n> > an inexpensive solution to full duplex contacts for the linear birds and I\n> > ran across the Kenwood TH-F6A hand held 144, 222, and 450 MHZ FM with SSB\n> > option on receive only.  That sounds to me like a great fairly inexpensive\n> > solution.\n> >\n> > Has anyone tried one of these yet for satellite work?\n> >\n> > And I'm wondering if there would be a de-sense problem if used on receive\n> > with a 20 watt transmitter on a different band close to it?\n> >\n> > WA7HQD\n> > Lee (Doc) Ernstrom\n> > Syracuse, Ut DN-31xb\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> > Sent from my iPad\n> > _______________________________________________\n> > Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n> > expressed\n> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n> > AMSAT-NA.\n> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> >\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n \t\t \t   \t\t  ",
    "attachments": []
}