Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4RP2HIDRLMEGAWP2NAOFPHTIVHYOOHLF/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4RP2HIDRLMEGAWP2NAOFPHTIVHYOOHLF",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/MLN6EA2IR42R5XAMD64IKICHLQVJQTM7/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "nate (a) natetech.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Nate Duehr",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Lunar Architecture Moon Base",
    "date": "2006-12-05T08:56:45Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/MLN6EA2IR42R5XAMD64IKICHLQVJQTM7/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "James R Miller wrote:\n> On Dec 04, Pat, KA9SCF wrote: \n> \n>> With the amount of libration on the moon, what's the maximum antenna gain\n>> per band that you can get before it becomes too much of an issue.\n> \n> http://www.amsat.org/amsat/articles/g3ruh/110.html\n> \n> Perhaps this should be in the Amsat FAQ   =%-)\n> \n> 73 de James G3RUH\n\nPerhaps with all the \"noise\" (pun intended) here recently about \nunlicensed transmitters on 2.4 GHz... the following line from the article:\n\n\"For a given TX e.i.r.p., signal strength received at Earth depends only \non the mechanical size of the RX antenna; frequency is irrelevant [1]. \nNoise level however is not, and S-band (2.4 GHz) is a sensible downlink \nchoice because very low noise performance is robustly obtainable \"off \nthe shelf\".\"\n\nIs more controversial than it once was?  :-)\n\nOr maybe not.  Depends on who's arguments one liked during the recent \n2.4 GHz debate on the mailing list.\n\nThe above comments notwithstanding, nice article James.  Thanks for \nsharing the link.  I learned something from reading it, and that's \nalways a Good Thing.\n\nNate WY0X\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}