Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4RX4BW32DKBSIEE576L27EOPNPJSQR6U/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "7B287ED8B2B344CE9EBC3FD59F4BD250@K0TWHOME",
    "message_id_hash": "4RX4BW32DKBSIEE576L27EOPNPJSQR6U",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/4RX4BW32DKBSIEE576L27EOPNPJSQR6U/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "k0tw (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 910H vs Kenwood TS2000",
    "date": "2009-11-30T22:35:07Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IBXAPAPK6UVDLGFQRVYQLPJDJDAJ6LR7/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nBeing a recent newbie to the LEOs it had never even occurred to me that too\nnarrow a beam width could present a problem with staying pointed at those\nsatellites. Thanks, Reid, for bringing that thought up in my mind. I wasn't\ntaking it out of context. I was just wondering if it was an unforeseen\nproblem (by me) that I needed to address. It's things like this that allow\nus to learn.\n\nIt appears that a narrow beam width is not normally a problem and I thank\nJohn and others who pointed that out. \n\n73,\nTom, KØTW\n\n> I have used a Cushcraft 13B2 (13 elements) on 2m and a Cushcraft 719B (19\nelements) on 70cm on the \n> satellites with no problem.  Didn't experience either as being too narrow\nbeamwidth for sat use.\n>\n> 73s John AA5JG\n>\n> I am amazed at how many people take things stated out of context on this \n> reflector. I never said that any of the arrays would not work due to \n> problem they were having hearing the satellites and it was stated that \n> if none of the other suggestions worked to consider that the arrays they \n> are using are pointed correctly in the correct direction of the \n> satellite. Pointing being off, the nulls could easily block the \n> satellite's reception. The larger the array the more this might be \n> evident. The larger the array, stacked arrays and even dish antennas, \n> pointing becomes a bit more critical.\n>\n> Reid, W4UPD\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}