Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4UWV6UK3FQHA5FPJD2I6OXIWOWG6OMMQ/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4UWV6UK3FQHA5FPJD2I6OXIWOWG6OMMQ/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4UWV6UK3FQHA5FPJD2I6OXIWOWG6OMMQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/LR4NNKOJCGFWEQR4DY2MJEHW73IAWJRT/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "updwrb (a) bristor-assoc.com",
        "mailman_id": "6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/6a38e6f613ad494f85758faeecec9d50/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "w4upd",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: HRD software question",
    "date": "2009-08-06T14:48:18Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TIDSG6457PADQKFM7WPAV37SVT22SMNZ/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Gotcha! You are correct. maybe the independences that were discussed \nwith 5.x will take care of that problem. It would be nice to bring up \njust the satellite portion only. I have been so use to using WISP32 \nsince my SATGATE days that I use it most of the time except on my newer \nradios. HRD indeed is very good and looks even more promising for the \nfuture. I have downloaded the 5.x beta version but have yet to install \nit to see how it does.\n\nRegards,\n\n    Reid, W4UPD\n\n\n\[email protected] wrote:\n> Hey Reid,\n>  \n> Thanks for your note. Using the same package here - V 4.1, Build 1985.\n>  \n> And yes, you can access Satellite Tracker without connecting radios to \n> it - but you can't connect radios to it without ALSO connecting them \n> to HRD. Therein could lie the problem.\n>  \n> DM780 is useable without connecting radios to HRD. I routinely do that \n> when I'm working digital modes in HF.\n>  \n> My only interest in computer connection for Satellite Tracker is \n> Doppler control. I would like to be able to connect directly to it and \n> use it as a \"stand-alone\" without HRD involved. I believe that \n> could/would solve the issues I experience here.\n>  \n> 73,\n>  \n> Tim - N3TL\n> Athens, Ga. - EM84ha\n>\n>     -------------- Original message from w4upd\n>     <[email protected]>: --------------\n>\n>\n>     > Which beta version of 4.1 are you using? I found that I had the\n>     same\n>     > problem until 4.1 build 1985. Satellite stuff can be accessed\n>     without a\n>     > rig hooked up. I did find that resources can really get eaten up\n>     by HRD\n>     > when doing satellite stuff. If the description of HRD V5.0 is\n>     correct,\n>     > it may ease up the overhead on computers by not trying to do so\n>     many\n>     > things at once (some of which you may not need).\n>     >\n>     > Reid, W4UPD\n>     >\n>     >\n>     >\n>     >\n>     > [email protected] wrote:\n>     > > Simon and all,\n>     > > > I have been using V 4.1 Beta for a few months, and my sense\n>     is that all of the multitasking HRD requires is taxing the\n>     processor on my Acer Aspire One netbook beyond its capacity. I may\n>     be wrong about that, but I suspect that's what's\n>     > going on.\n>     > > > Simon, please correct me if this is wrong - but I believe\n>     that V 4.1 (beta) requires that radios be connected to the main\n>     HRD suite, and then also connected to the Satellite Tracker, in\n>     order to provide computer control for Doppler\n>     > tuning. If that is, indeed, the case, I wonder whether it's\n>     possible to enable\n>     > Satellite Tracker's radio-related functions without connection\n>     to HRD? I suspect\n>     > that if I was able to connect my radios directly to Satellite\n>     Tracker without\n>     > using HRD, that the netbook might be able handle the load.\n>     > >\n>     > > I enjoy Satellite Tracker very much, but it has locked up my\n>     computer at the\n>     > very worst of times (e.g., just a few seconds before acquisition\n>     of AO-7 when I\n>     > had a schedule with EA8AVI in an attempt to add Africa to my\n>     continents-worked\n>     > list). I chose the netbook for my ham radio use because of its\n>     size, and because\n>     > it was bundled with Windows XP, not Vista. I fear that the\n>     decision has me\n>     > comitted to a computer with a processor that may not have enough\n>     muscle to do\n>     > everything HRD/Satellite Tracker asks it to do.\n>     > >\n>     > > Regardless ... thank you so much for all of your work on HRD\n>     and Satellite\n>     > Tracker. HRD is an amazing suite of software.\n>     > >\n>     > > 73 to all,\n>     > >\n>     > > Tim - N3TL\n>     > > Athens, Ga. - EM84ha\n>     > > -------------- Original message from \"Simon (HB9DRV)\" :\n>     > --------------\n>     > >\n>     > >\n>     > >\n>     > >> Hi,\n>     > >>\n>     > >> I guess it's something I've never really tried - will do so\n>     and fix.\n>     > >>\n>     > >> Simon Brown, HB9DRV\n>     > >> www.ham-radio-deluxe.com\n>     > >>\n>     > >> ----- Original Message -----\n>     > >> From: \"Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF\"\n>     > >>\n>     > >>\n>     > >>> Any idea why, if I select SHOW TRACKS/ALL the prog locks up\n>     when Orbitron\n>     > >>> is capable of displaying the same number (85) of sats\n>     without slowing?\n>     > >>> What is the maximun number we can sensibly display>\n>     > >>>\n>     > >> _______________________________________________\n>     > >> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of\n>     the author.\n>     > >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur\n>     satellite program!\n>     > >> Subscription settings:\n>     http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>     > >>\n>     > > _______________________________________________\n>     > > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of\n>     the author.\n>     > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur\n>     satellite program!\n>     > > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>     > >\n>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>\n>     > >\n>     > >\n>     > > No virus found in this incoming message.\n>     > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com\n>     > > Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.45/2285 - Release\n>     Date: 08/06/09\n>     > 05:57:00\n>     > >\n>     > >\n>     >\n>     > _______________________________________________\n>     > Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the\n>     author.\n>     > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur\n>     satellite program!\n>     > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n>\n> ------------------------------------------------------------------------\n>\n>\n> No virus found in this incoming message.\n> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com \n> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.45/2285 - Release Date: 08/06/09 05:57:00\n>\n>   \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}