Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4YT73PPOIUTARWTBJCWCMNOTRYFQU5RA/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "4YT73PPOIUTARWTBJCWCMNOTRYFQU5RA",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/C7WXMEJDWEDUYW7FFPMITDRH7VGAXGLU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat-bb (a) wd9ewk.net",
        "mailman_id": "21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Rig debate time...",
    "date": "2010-10-16T22:35:35Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/FVIP6J2QJIV4GMEZDHCNS53OS7UOUH6B/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Steve,\n\nThe AMSAT-BB archives since August 2006 are at:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb\n\nOlder messages are also archived at a different URL,\nwhich I don't have out here near the middle of nowhere.\n\n73!\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK - north of Sunsites, Arizona\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\n\n\n\nOn 10/16/10, STeve Andre' <[email protected]> wrote:\n>   On 10/16/10 17:01, K8TB wrote:\n>>        So I have an Icom IC-821 that I am using for the birds, SSB and\n>> FM. I don't know what to say, but that rig isn't quite there.\n>>       So I am trying to decide between a TS-2000 and an IC-910H. I've had\n>> a 2000 in the past, and it is a pretty good rig. But I've heard that the\n>> 910H is \"better\", more or less. I have mast mounted SSB preamps to\n>> equalize everything out.\n>>\n>>       Anyone on the list own both an IC-910H and a TS-2000, and do you\n>> have any thoughts on the use of them for sat use? (I don't really need\n>> the low band part of the TS-2000, I have a K3 there).\n>>\n>>       tom bosscher K8TB\n> Hello Tom,\n>\n> I'm not sure where it is, but in the archives where was a discussion\n> about IC-910 vs TS-2000 wars, which had some good comments in\n> it.  I personally prefer the IC-910 (I have one) but have played with\n> a TS-2000 for less than 10 hours.\n>\n> So, where is the archive?\n>\n> --STeve Andre'\n> wb8wsf  en82\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}