Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/523BQ6DXKU3K34KXW3YUFMSCRSNE5UFQ/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "523BQ6DXKU3K34KXW3YUFMSCRSNE5UFQ",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KM3J77RBCB4ZKIYCGWH7C3EA6LZ3DRMG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "glennmaillist (a) bellsouth.net",
        "mailman_id": "9677ac3fd61446a98cdc2cafdc18ac14",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/9677ac3fd61446a98cdc2cafdc18ac14/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Glenn Little WB4UIV",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch",
    "date": "2011-05-21T20:18:31Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ASVW5EHUR44SHQDLY7KTCU45VRRFPN2Z/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/CIPL3MC2VRYQAG5ORSHNWGOLJKAURVUB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "The rules are in effect to prevent possible interference to the \naircraft navigation aids and communications equipment.\nThe potential for mix produces from numerous consumer grade \nelectronic devices emitting part 15 compliant RF is just to \nunpredictable for the FAA to allow these possible RF sources to be \nenergized during the landing and take off phase of flight.\nIf the interference were to occur at a higher flight level, the pilot \nhas longer to respond and get the interfering emitter shut down.\nDuring landing and take off the reaction time is just too long to \nallow the devices to be turned on.\n\nIt is not a matter of general EMI.\nIt is a matter of mix products from unknown emitters causing on \nchannel interference to sensitive receivers.\n\n73\nGlenn\nWB4UIV\nARRL Technical Specialist\n\n\nAt 01:28 PM 5/21/2011, Art McBride wrote:\n>So what happens to this airplane when it flies near a FM or TV broadcast\n>station? FAA rules call for EMI testing using 1 amp RF currents in wire\n>bundles in the aircraft.\n>\n>This Cell Phone / computer/electronic interference from consumer electronics\n>is a compilation of half truths, myths and deception. A shameful compilation\n>of rules designed to intimidate from an origination that should be\n>scientific in nature, and totally understand electromagnetic radiation.\n>Maybe it is the \"Federal\" part in the FAA name that explains this behavior!\n>\n>Art,\n>KC6UQH\n>\n>-----Original Message-----\n>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\n>Behalf Of George Henry\n>Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 2:35 PM\n>To: AMSAT\n>Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch\n>\n>And what was her iPhone doing turned on during approach?  Still a no-no on\n>all\n>commercial carriers, AFAIK...\n>\n>\n>George, KA3HSW\n>\n>\n>\n>----- Original Message ----\n> > From: Clint Bradford <[email protected]>\n> > To: AMSAT BB <[email protected]>\n> > Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 2:20:44 PM\n> > Subject: [amsat-bb] In-flight iPhone snaps Space Shuttle launch\n> >\n> > The story behind the photo taken of the Space Shuttle from an in-flight\n> >passenger jet. Stefanie Gordon shot the image of Endeavour's launch with\n>her\n> >iPhone as her plane descended for a landing.\n> >\n> >\n> >\n>http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/17/in-flight-iphone-snaps-space-shuttle-launch/\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> >\n> > Clint Bradford\n> > [email protected]\n>\n>\n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n>database 6136 (20110519) __________\n>\n>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n>\n>http://www.eset.com\n>\n>\n>\n>\n>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n>database 6136 (20110519) __________\n>\n>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n>\n>http://www.eset.com\n>\n>\n>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n>database 6140 (20110521) __________\n>\n>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n>\n>http://www.eset.com\n>\n>\n>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n>database 6141 (20110521) __________\n>\n>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n>\n>http://www.eset.com\n>\n>\n>\n>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature\n>database 6141 (20110521) __________\n>\n>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.\n>\n>http://www.eset.com\n>\n>\n>\n>_______________________________________________\n>Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}