Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5FAZNUXMYWUGWY6XJM35PAVFDFKF7VSE/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "681831520.7092771271541696604.JavaMail.root@sz0126a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "5FAZNUXMYWUGWY6XJM35PAVFDFKF7VSE",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/HOBOCOIMIH53UM3HYV5UY7FQ2TPCYLA6/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bob- W7LRD",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Arecibo",
    "date": "2010-04-17T22:01:36Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HVCNQOHGJQMNPWCNW375DU6DJFAI3TVX/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nHi Mike-Yes the default is RHCP.  I found LHCP was necessary to hear Arecibo, when switching to RHCP the signal disappeared. \n\n73 Bob W7LRD \n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Michael Pfeuffer\" <[email protected]> \nTo: \"i8cvs\" <[email protected]>, [email protected] \nSent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 2:52:37 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific \nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: Arecibo \n\nThis was my experience with a KLM 435-40CX and no preamp into a \nFT-736R.  I had to energize the relay on the antenna in order to hear \nthem.  I assume it's RHCP normally, and LHCP when the relay is energized. \n\nI actually had better copy during the SSB portion than the CW, but am \nnot sure why that was. \n\n--Mike WQ5C \n\n\nOn 4/17/2010 4:31 PM, i8cvs wrote: \n> Hi Bob, W7LRD \n> \n> What polarization have you used on your 40 el cp ? RHCP or LHCP ? I am sure \n> that with LHCP it was a very consistant signal and with RHCP nothing was \n> heard. \n> \n> Please confirm ! \n> \n> Tanks \n> \n> 73\" de \n> \n> i8CVS Domenico \n> \n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: \"Bob- W7LRD\"<[email protected]> \n> To:<[email protected]> \n> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 10:57 PM \n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Arecibo \n> \n> \n>     \n>> \n>> Very consistant signal 910/40el cp. I wish they would use dxpedition qso \n>>       \n> methods for more qso/hr. This is a very finite opportunity. Had fun anyway, \n> better luck tomorrow. \n>     \n>> 73 Bob W7LRD \n>> _______________________________________________ \n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n>> \n>>       \n> \n> \n> _______________________________________________ \n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n>     \n\n_______________________________________________ \nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}