Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5HK54EDQQ75X5JHFVFXYLQYAGKIE6WIO/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "5HK54EDQQ75X5JHFVFXYLQYAGKIE6WIO",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6WKYVCFHWKTMVFBPJJFIT7MBE4TW3FT2/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "n4zpt (a) cox.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Tom Azlin N4ZPT",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: BeeSat at 4800 GMSK",
    "date": "2010-04-11T11:25:10Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TCJLTHTDOSMI7LURHHDERGOOL6UBKK77/",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "NO.  I was simply saying that the open source is there for the 4800 bps \nGMSK sound card modem. NOT using D-STAR Digital Voice. That has already \nbeen done via satellite.\n\nNO, I was just saying ignore the high speed mode.\n\n73, Tom n4zpt\n\nNathaniel S. Parsons wrote:\n> Ah, thanks for clarifying. Unfortunately, if I understand you correctly, we\n> would have to talk to our satellite via digital voice, or at 128kbps, which\n> would be great if we could!\n> \n> -Nate\n> \n> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Tom Azlin N4ZPT <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n>> Well, make that the digital voice part of the protocol. The high speed\n>> digital data part is up to 128kbps which was not what I was thinking of.\n>>\n>> 73, tom n4zpt\n>>\n>> Tom Azlin N4ZPT wrote:\n>>\n>>> Hi Nate,\n>>>\n>>> the D-STAR protocol is only GMSK at 4800 bps and they selected a\n>>> time-bandwidth product of 0.5. 4,800 bps or 4k8 is perhaps not talked about\n>>> as that IS the standard for D-STAR. So the software there might be\n>>> adaptable.  that is the reason I thought to suggest it.\n>>>\n>>> Good luck and 73, Tom n4zpt\n>>>\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> Nathaniel S. Parsons wrote:\n>>>\n>>>> Hi Tom,\n>>>>\n>>>> My mind had indeed played a trick on me, and I remembered MFSK as MSK.\n>>>>\n>>>> As far as the DStar group goes, I don't see any mention of 4800 bps or\n>>>> 4k8\n>>>> kbps on the public page, so if it's not the group's focus, I don't want\n>>>> to\n>>>> have to rely on that solution.\n>>>>\n>>>> Thanks,\n>>>> -Nate KC2SVI\n>>>>\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>>\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>\n>>>\n> \n",
    "attachments": []
}