Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5JIYTBK74Z7B5CZSCEZDCJICJOUOQB6U/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "D5A45180E680418B93BE10F956EBD60D@parents",
    "message_id_hash": "5JIYTBK74Z7B5CZSCEZDCJICJOUOQB6U",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/KER7EO3QGCQ5GEKDEO2J2O4R7IFLZSCZ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "ka3hsw (a) att.net",
        "mailman_id": "afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/afface7d7e8049fda539552165bdde78/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "George Henry",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Saturday evening @ WD9EWK - two AO-85 passes...",
    "date": "2015-10-12T04:56:47Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KER7EO3QGCQ5GEKDEO2J2O4R7IFLZSCZ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "So, from Patrick's experience, it sounds like the uplink is about 10kHz \nlower than the published frequency?  Has this been everyone else's \nexperience?\n\nGeorge, KA3HSW\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)\" <[email protected]>\nTo: <[email protected]>\nSent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 9:17 AM\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Saturday evening @ WD9EWK - two AO-85 passes...\n\n\n<snip>\n> For the uplink, I was able to get through using 435.165 MHz for my two\n> QSOs with the KG-UV8D. Downlink... I started on 145.9825 MHz, then tuned\n> down to 145.980 MHz, and later I tuned down to 145.9775 MHz. Just like I\n> saw when I used my KG-UV9D Friday evening, the sharper receive filters in\n> the Chinese-made radios made using the smaller tuning step (2.5 kHz)\n> useful.\n>\n> After this pass, I played the HDSDR RF recording into FoxTelem, and\n> uploaded 9 packets to the AMSAT server. Had I used the Elk with the SDR\n> setup, I am sure I would have collected many more packets from that pass.\n>\n> The second pass I worked, around 0400 UTC, was a shallow pass. AO-85 was\n> only up to a maximum elevation of just over 11 degrees. I used only my\n> Icom IC-2820H for this pass. I had used the IC-2820H as the uplink radio\n> for a pass I worked Friday evening with my SDRplay receiver and HDSDR\n> handling the downlink, but wanted to try the mobile radio by itself this\n> time. it had no problems hearing the downlink, once AO-85 rose above the\n> nearby mountains and houses.\n>\n> I started the radio on 435.160 MHz for the uplink (with 67.0 Hz tone\n> activated for this VFO), and 145.980 MHz for the downlink. Both with\n> narrow FM, a suggestion that had been tweeted earlier by Peter 2E0SQL. I\n> was not able to get through using 435.160 MHz, but was able to when I\n> tuned my uplink to 435.165 MHz. Later in the pass, I could get through\n> when transmitting on 435.170 and 435.175 MHz. I had to use 15W, and at\n> times 50W, to get through. The pass was too shallow for me to get through\n> at 5W. Around the midpoint of the pass, possibly just after that, I had\n> to tune my receive VFO down to 145.975 MHz to hear the rest of the pass.\n> I mostly heard stations in California, along with W7JPI in southern\n> Arizona and WQ3U in Oregon, and logging a total of 5 QSOs (working all I\n> heard, except for WQ3U).\n<snip> \n\n\n---\nThis email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.\nhttps://www.avast.com/antivirus\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}