Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5L52VKUM3II2GO5O3IMCVAVHTBUPKVQL/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "5L52VKUM3II2GO5O3IMCVAVHTBUPKVQL",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RAZRUCRVK6XOF2ZIQJZCWDJ236RCX5WD/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "myles.landstein (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "cb9b30d952874ae18d5acc7eda29ec0e",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/cb9b30d952874ae18d5acc7eda29ec0e/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "myles landstein",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: IF you had a choice...",
    "date": "2009-07-17T11:22:40Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZZEOSDF6EFJDFLI7N5UI6UD2367SEPDQ/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/N2BY7VQOBC2FOZADYZR2Y7KQIU7CM435/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "surprized that no one mentioned  the IC 910 has  birdie  as well\n\n\neach has  it's pro's  and con's for sure\n\nN2EHG\n\n\nOn Jul 16, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Jim Leder wrote:\n\n> I've had a TS2000 since 2005, and have never regretted my purchase.  \n> Sure,\n> there is an unfortunate birdie that messes up SO50 and AO27, but so  \n> what. I\n> resurrected an old Kenwood TM-G707A to deal with those two FM birds,  \n> and it\n> works great. I also have an FT-857D which also does a nice job on  \n> those two\n> birds. I would naturally expect the comments on this board to lean  \n> towards\n> the IC-910H, and, indeed, it is a fine SATELLITE rig. But, my number  \n> one\n> preference in operating is the HF bands, not satellite. Guess what I  \n> am\n> saying is if VHF/UHF and satellite is your only operating  \n> preference, then\n> the Icom might be a better rig. But, if you also like to do the HF  \n> bands\n> with an occasional hop to the satellites, the TS2000 is pretty good.  \n> Is the\n> TS2000 the best HF rig? Probably not, but it's the only one that  \n> offers\n> pretty good HF operation AND reasonable satellite operation in the  \n> same box.\n>\n>     Jim Bob Buckeye\n>            AKA\n>  **** Jim Leder****\n>    K8CXM since 1961\n> IBM retiree since 1999\n>\n> There are 10 types of people in this world -- those who understand  \n> binary\n> and those who don't.\n>\n>\n>\n> ----- Original Message -----\n> From: \"David Barber\" <[email protected]>\n> To: <[email protected]>\n> Cc: <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:02 PM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: IF you had a choice...\n>\n>\n>> SSB for me too, F0-29 & V0-52.\n>>\n>> Can't raise any consistent enthusiasm for FM birds with the  \n>> exception of\n>> our\n>> friends up in the ISS.\n>>\n>> I can have the same abuse much more easily on the local FM  \n>> repeater. :-)\n>>\n>> So the TS2000 has a birdie, OK, but for those that don't want all  \n>> their\n>> eggs\n>> in one basket it is very good and it doesn't need another mortgage  \n>> spent\n>> on\n>> a Hi-Stab LO to stop it roaming around on its own.  Well at 1296MHz\n>> anyway!\n>>\n>> Retires to bomb shelter!\n>>\n>> David\n>> G8OQW\n>>\n>>\n>>\n>> -----Original Message-----\n>> From: [email protected] [mailto:amsat-bb- \n>> [email protected]] On\n>> Behalf Of Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF\n>> Sent: 16 July 2009 18:51\n>> To: [email protected]\n>> Cc: [email protected]\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: IF you had a choice...\n>>\n>> I cut my teeth on Oscar 6 and 7, 2M UP, 10M DOWN, SSB.\n>>\n>>\n>> David - KG4ZLB wrote:\n>> easy sats, the FM voice, 2m up 70cm down or 70cm up 2m down,\n>>> that everyone cuts their teeth on!\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n>> author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n>> author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the  \n> author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite  \n> program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\nMyles Landstein\[email protected]\nplease note my   new email address\ndti will soon be eliminated , gmail is my new home  update your dir\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}