Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5LLXBFUFCI7FU3JEWDJQUFRAEXSQCHOS/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "84F375248E504784B2FC2A4785084AF7@CSI9020",
    "message_id_hash": "5LLXBFUFCI7FU3JEWDJQUFRAEXSQCHOS",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/GNHZFZCHHWGG2UOHFYAIXF5SUFTFGH5Z/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "scott23192 (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "120e10e05ba14969a11da0a96d21e355",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/120e10e05ba14969a11da0a96d21e355/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Scott",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Re-entry predictions for BY70-1",
    "date": "2017-01-30T00:35:29Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/YN7C5D3XQAOLHCT3IF5WJB2JGBZRHP6S/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ZQXFVRFVCVCTCOHZ74BMVXQG72T3KWIO/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "So, if you happen to be on a border between two grid squares & you make a \nsatellite contact that becomes a meteor scatter contact, do you just sit \nback and watch your logging program explode?\n\n-Scott,  K4KDR\n\n==========================================================\n\n-----Original Message----- \nFrom: Ken Alexander\nSent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 7:23 PM\nTo: [email protected]\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re-entry predictions for BY70-1\n\nA unique meteor scatter opportunity!\n\n73,\n\nKen\nVE3HLS\n\n\nOn 2017-01-29 5:51 PM, Mac A. Cody wrote:\n> Todd and Joe,\n>\n> Given that BY70-1 is a 2U cubesat measuring 10x10x20cm and weighing\n> only a few kilograms (details here:\n> https://amsat-uk.org/2016/12/27/by70-1-fm-transponder-satellite/),\n> it will completely burn up upon reentry.  When and where it will\n> burn up, of course, depends on the orbital dynamics, atmospheric\n> conditions (the sun's radiation affects the height of the top of the\n> atmosphere), and the satellite cross-section.  The eventual demise may\n> be over one of the oceans or a cloudy region, with no one present or\n> able to witness it.\n>\n> Since BY70-1 is reported to have 3-axis stabilization, we may be\n> able to enjoy its use right up to its fiery end.  I have been trying\n> to work BY70-1 as much as my other responsibilities will allow. I\n> encourage all to do the same.\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Mac / AE5PH\n>\n> On 01/29/2017 10:07 AM, Todd Deckard wrote:\n>> Greetings Joe!\n>>\n>> space-track.org lists the decay epoch as 2017-02-22 0:00:00 -- note this \n>> is not strictly the re-entry time but perhaps gives us an approximate \n>> window?\n>>\n>> I do not understand the material very well.  It appears for large objects \n>> they will calculate a time-and-impact prediction as things become more \n>> certain but perhaps poor Bayi-Kepu-Weixing-1 may not rate as it doesn't \n>> pose a hazard.\n>>\n>> I don't even know if it would be visible during re-entry given the speed?\n>>\n>>> When will we have a closer idea of when it may re-enter?\n>>>\n>>> It would be neat to try to catch it on video.\n>>>\n>>> Joe WB9SBD \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}