Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/5QURESSH2PAANOPZDIBFJ4CTYUY5EXQD/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "5QURESSH2PAANOPZDIBFJ4CTYUY5EXQD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "aa5uk (a) yahoo.com",
        "mailman_id": "ccd7bbd4f5f849339fc0c8814b1bc350",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/ccd7bbd4f5f849339fc0c8814b1bc350/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Adrian Engele",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Optimal QTH? (Re:  WAS-SAT 38 Years Later!",
    "date": "2016-06-07T23:49:05Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/B6LZU5SGG7TUUJXRHDKUCKTQVW3XLG5G/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/HA5I2QMGI54I53NDESDZLTMSRFXPXCCB/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Peter,\nGet your lat/long first: http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html\n\nThen go to the bottom of the AMSAT page look for your satellites of choice. The satellite range will be mostly accurate but change slightly over a period of time depending on when a satellite is at apogee at certain times. \n\nhttp://www.amsat.org/?page_id=4751  \n\nEnter your lat/Long and the satellite range. Then create a sheet for each satellite based on your home or portable location. This will tell you what you should be able to work. \n\nhttp://ns6t.net/azimuth/azimuth.html\nGood luck!\n73, Adrian AA5UK - ZF2AE (in a few weeks)\n\n      From: Peter Laws <[email protected]>\n To: Amsat Bb <[email protected]> \n Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 3:57 PM\n Subject: [amsat-bb] Optimal QTH? (Re: WAS-SAT 38 Years Later!\n   \nOn Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:02 AM, R.T.Liddy <[email protected]> wrote:\n> SAT Operators,\n> I just received my WAS-Satellite Award #341 which ended upcovering 38 years of casual operating!\n\nCongrats!\n\nI am currently awaiting an Arrow from Arrow HQ and hope to start\nmaking contacts.  Not sure I can wait 38 years, however.  :-)\n\nI am in EM15, so shouldn't have much trouble even with LEOs, but has\nanyone calculated the \"optimal\" area for WAS QSOs?  I would expect\nit's pretty close to where I am but footprint is a factor, too.\nAnyone figured it out?\n\n\n\n\n-- \nPeter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\nto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\nare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n\n  \n",
    "attachments": []
}