Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/66XWBZF34XG3CMQDBY2RL7SMUFVCSGKT/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "66XWBZF34XG3CMQDBY2RL7SMUFVCSGKT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/O675VZNK6RTWMNGV7EUB5DZPENPTN3BX/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kellyrkeeton (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "e9511165fb6a403489c0c2d9495a0284",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/e9511165fb6a403489c0c2d9495a0284/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Kelly Keeton",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Southern CA Satellite Presentations",
    "date": "2016-06-27T15:59:53Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/C34TRU7ZYPAVG7S2E7D2Q45FS5663B53/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/THFCCSFXUB4NH2TUIFICOY4CEKE4TPLB/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Can we argue in a less public email reflector. \n\nWe all get it - some people like ford some people like Chevy let's bury it or take it offline. My inbox is tired of this. \n\nSent from a mobile device. \n\n> On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Daron Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> Cliff, unless I'm missing something, you claim below to never say:\n> \n>> \"It is not mandatory to work full-duplex. - PERIOD.\"\n> \n> Then you say what you tell your class is:\n> \n>> Although this\n>> method is preferred, it is not mandatory:\n> \n> I'm a little confused...\n> \n> \n> \n> Sent from my iPhone\n> \n> On Jun 26, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Clint Bradford <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n>>>> ... you would quit telling people that full duplex is \"not mandatory\" for working sats.\n>> \n>> You've never attended one of my sat sessions. I have never uttered the sentence to groups, \n>> \"It is not mandatory to work full-duplex. - PERIOD.\" My standard mantra for the easy FM birds\n>> is all over the place:\n>> \n>> \"Ideally, we should be working the satellites in full duplex mode, where we can\n>> simultaneously listen to the downlink as we are transmitting. Although this\n>> method is preferred, it is not mandatory: Carefully monitor the downlink, and\n>> wait for a break in the conversations to announce yourself.\"\n>> \n>> People you might be hearing stepping on others are not following those instructions.\n>> \n>> And all my audiences are very graphically shown and told the reasons why working full-\n>> duplex is preferable.\n>> \n>> I didn't work full-duplex when speaking with Commander Wiseman - who was aboard \n>> the ISS at the time during Field Day 2014.\n>> \n>> If you haven't already given a presentation to your club on working the easy birds, \n>> I am available. Just send me an email message.\n>> \n>> Clint Bradford K6LCS\n>> (909) 999-SATS\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n",
    "attachments": []
}