Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6BYPW2MWKDVRLAXHGRGYGIJPAD57ESGM/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "6BYPW2MWKDVRLAXHGRGYGIJPAD57ESGM",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/H5FIZSJQ3OOJFZQLJYFCKF3NP6UYPSFZ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gary_mayfield (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Field Day Rules ARRL -vs.- AMSAT",
    "date": "2008-05-25T21:05:01Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/TQZUQAX2XEFV52BHNDSIUOSFJCQZMVUZ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Bruce,\n\n    Thanks for the AMSAT heads up.  I have contacted the ARRL directly and\ntheir response is what prompted my email.\n\n73,\nJoe kk0sd\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: Bruce [mailto:[email protected]] \nSent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:34 AM\nTo: Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield; [email protected]\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day Rules ARRL -vs.- AMSAT\n\nYou have interpreted the AMSAT rules correctly. However, we are not in a \nposition to interpret the ARRL rules. I would suggest contacting someone \nat the ARRL for clarification. Even asking another ham could lead to \nthat ham's interpretation and not the real deal.\n\n73...bruce\nAMSAT Director Contests & Awards\n(one of my official titles)\n\nGary \"Joe\" Mayfield wrote:\n> The ARRL Field Day rules regarding satellites are difficult for me to\n> understand.  I asked for a clarification of the one contact FM bird rule\nand\n> did not hear what I expected.  What they mean is \"one contact per FM voice\n> satellite\"\n>\n>\n>\n> For example: if AO-51 is running VU and LS you get one contact, not one on\n> each transponder. (The opposite of AMSAT I believe)\n>\n>\n>\n> I believe there are more differences;\n>\n> On AO-7 where working a station in mode A and then working it again in\nmode\n> B would be two contacts for AMSAT, but a dupe for ARRL.\n>\n>\n>\n> In fact working a station on AO-7 (either transponder) and then on VO-52\nis\n> a dupe in the ARRL (but not AMSAT) rules as \"Satellite\" is a single band\nin\n> the eyes of the ARRL.\n>\n>\n>\n> I'm trying to stay out of trouble this year, so if anyone has any\nadditional\n> clarifications please let me know, or if you know this to be wrong let me\n> know.\n>\n>\n>\n> Thanks and 73,\n>\n> Joe kk0sd\n>\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n>    \n\n\n-- \n\nBruce Paige, KK5DO\n\nAMSAT Director Contests and Awards\n\nARRL Awards Manager (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE\n\nHouston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on SkyScanner Satellite Radio Network on\nGalaxy-25 @97° West,\nTransponder 23 (12115 Vert), Symbol Rate: 22425, APID: 1794 (DVB Free To\nAir)\nAlso streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com\nPodcast at http://www.amsatnet.com/podcast.xml or iTunes\n\nLatest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News\nhttp://www.arrl.org\n\n\n\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}