Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6D4UDGLO6TKUQSJRJEFZJKK6WMMVRSYD/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CADYce2LhtdDDSDNx3Sqj6jBeKbF8fGnMDgqVR0DvORQQ-Kbr8w@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "6D4UDGLO6TKUQSJRJEFZJKK6WMMVRSYD",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WCGTIORDRTF5VSZZV34PJT4PNZEULCLL/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "wa9wud (a) gmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "b61c628bb8f14c3ea8858ac9236370f9",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/b61c628bb8f14c3ea8858ac9236370f9/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Alan Blind",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 and Satellites Question",
    "date": "2019-08-09T12:08:32Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/ENK7GOFL6IPWPLKSL4TBBUFFPXGKCAPO/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/4XQXQWGNTW7GITUTHXZOIUFFNODRNTZH/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Found it.  IO-86 was the problem.  I removed IO-86 and the list now sorts\nAOS/LOS.\n\nAlan\n\nOn Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:00 AM Alan Blind <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> Interesting....\n>\n> I tried each of the pre-programmed groups to see if each would sort.  The\n> groups are standard, FM Repeaters, Linear 1 and Linear 2.\n>\n> All would sort, except for FM Repeaters.  FM Repeaters would not sort for\n> AOS/LOS.\n>\n> Sats in the FM group include SO-50, AO-85, AO-91, LILIACAST-2 (not\n> included in my custom list), and IO-86.  Could one or more of these Sats be\n> the problem?\n>\n> Alan\n>\n> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:47 AM Alan Blind <[email protected]> wrote:\n>\n>> Hi Erich.  Thanks for the response.\n>>\n>> Here is my custom list.  I believe these are all Low Earth Sats..\n>>\n>> AO-07, AO-73, AO-91, AO-92, CAS-4A, CAS-4B, IO-86, SO-50, XW-2A, XW-2B,\n>> XW-2C, XW-2F.\n>>\n>> I believe some may not have complete data sets....could that be causing\n>> the failure to sort?  If so, how do I identify the culprit?\n>>\n>> Alan\n>>\n>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:39 AM Erich Eichmann <[email protected]>\n>> wrote:\n>>\n>>> Hi Alan,\n>>> check whether one of the selected sats is a geostationary one, e.g.\n>>> QO-100, which does not rise and set but  is continously in range.\n>>> When I add QO-100 to the 'Selected' list, the Countown window does no\n>>> longer sort the sats by their AOS/LOS times (but in alphabetical order). My\n>>> friend LX1BB reports the same observation.\n>>>\n>>> 73s, Erich, DK1TB\n>>>\n>>> Am 09.08.2019 um 12:03 schrieb Alan Blind via AMSAT-BB:\n>>> Umesh\n>>>\n>>> Here is the path the SatPC32 installer defaulted to.  -  :\\Program Files\n>>> (x86)\\SatPC32\\SatPC32ISS.exe\"\n>>>\n>>> Another observation.  When I use one of the groups included in the\n>>> SatPC package, it sorts in the order of AOS.  However, when I customize\n>>> a\n>>> group by adding new Sats, the customized list no longer sorts??\n>>>\n>>> Alan\n>>>\n>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:09 AM [email protected]\n>>> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>\n>>> wrote:\n>>>\n>>> Works fine here,\n>>>\n>>> the only thing I can think of is that, I hope SatPC32 is NOT installed\n>>> under any Windows folders like Program Files 32 or Documents etc.\n>>>\n>>> Umesh\n>>> k6vug\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> On Thursday, August 8, 2019, 10:21:07 AM PDT, Alan Blind via AMSAT-BB <\n>>> [email protected]> wrote:\n>>>\n>>>\n>>> New to Satellites and SatPC32.\n>>>\n>>> Question - On the “CountDown” accessory, there are two buttons for\n>>> sorting\n>>> the list.  I prefer to select “AOS/LOS Times”.  When I select, the list\n>>> stays in the “Ident/Letters” order.\n>>>\n>>> What am I doing wrong?\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>>> Opinions\n>>> expressed\n>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>>> AMSAT-NA.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>>> program!\n>>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>>> Opinions expressed\n>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>>> AMSAT-NA.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>>> program!\n>>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>>\n>>\n",
    "attachments": []
}