Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6DPUEH3ZGNM2MNJ2PGXLD7URO2JES25Y/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "3DD9BA9ED1334353B52C9F5091D3E70C@your6jnhhu0520",
    "message_id_hash": "6DPUEH3ZGNM2MNJ2PGXLD7URO2JES25Y",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/6DPUEH3ZGNM2MNJ2PGXLD7URO2JES25Y/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "mryan301 (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "bd66675a3fd2449d9a39d8aa56f5d5af",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/bd66675a3fd2449d9a39d8aa56f5d5af/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Mike Ryan",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Elk Antenna vs Arrow Antenna (Trey Brown)",
    "date": "2008-12-27T20:12:21Z",
    "parent": null,
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/P527Q47YRYQPCRX72Q6MW34KRWZACAVX/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "I have both. I started with the ELK due to the cheaper price as it does dual band without a duplexer. I've been very happy with it and its currently in my back yard on a rotor (its cold outside this time of year). For comparison, I bought the Arrow 5 months ago. Contrary to N3TL'd very respetable and valued comments, the Arrow does seem to do better for me, holding a signal a little lower in the sky. No leaps and bounds, but noticeable.\n\nI'd sum it up like this:\n\nElk\n+ cheaper all around\n+ can be easily set up for permanent use\n+ easier to aim due to wider beam width. Log periodic are like this.\n+ smaller and very fast setup/teardown\n+ one connector for dual band.\n- no handle for handheld use . You have to make one, but it's extremely easy to do. And no threads for tripod.\n- inconvenient if using 2 rigs. Must but a separate duplexer.\n\nArrow\n+ copies a few degrees (just a few) lower than the Elk at my QTH\n+ convenient built in handle and built in threads for tripod\n- narrower beam width - have to \"aim\" better.\n- not easily set up for permanent use. No simple mount and you wouldn't want to leave that \"in handle\" duplexer outside  \n- Can easily use for 2 rigs. Just don't use the duplexer (if so equipped) and plug into the separate UHF and VHF\n\nMike WB1AAT\n\n-------------- Original message from \"Trey Brown\" <[email protected]>: -------------- \n\n\n> I'm looking to get started in FM satellites and am considering \n> purchasing one of these antennas. Wanting to get some thoughts and \n> opinions from people that have been doing this longer than I have \n> been. \n> \n> http://www.elkantennas.com/2m4405element.htm \n> http://arrowantennas.com/146-437.html \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}