Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6DVCSYTZMRKMLBVRAM2662IWMZVGTWQC/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "CAN6TEUfYaeEYvT-J7Y0sdAy7MEGkzYydWjqO1=tuZG1Jpf=U4Q@mail.gmail.com",
    "message_id_hash": "6DVCSYTZMRKMLBVRAM2662IWMZVGTWQC",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/EUZVHVVCTTCZA5XV4FHYYBCT6FZ2GYVZ/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "amsat-bb (a) wd9ewk.net",
        "mailman_id": "21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/21664df01bef4757931b7cdb42a9e768/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Field Day",
    "date": "2016-09-27T20:22:16Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/EUZVHVVCTTCZA5XV4FHYYBCT6FZ2GYVZ/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Hi Bruce!\n\nIn keeing with your comment about \"never being too early to begin\npreparing for field day\", I wanted to ask how I would request a\nchange in the 2017 Field Day rules. I see the 2016 Field Day rules\nare still posted on the AMSAT web site, so I'll work with that for\nnow.\n\nAfter last June's Field Day, I posted a report of my activity\nhere on the AMSAT-BB list:\n\nhttp://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2016-June/059257.html\n\nNear the end of my post, I wondered aloud about the restriction on\none QSO per orbiting packet digipeater, similar to the restriction\non one QSO per FM satellite. I understand there was some reason that\nthe \"one QSO per digipeater\" rule came about in the past, but fail\nto see its need now. I made packet QSOs during the 2015 and 2016\nField Days, and only counted one per satellite for my AMSAT Field\nDay submissions. ARRL's Field Day rules do not have a restriction\non the number of QSOs per orbiting packet digipeater.\n\nThere was a fair bit of activity on the ISS passes I worked\nduring last June's Field Day. Using APRS messages, it was easy to\nmake quick exchanges with other stations. NO-84 was not busy, maybe\ndue to people not realizing its digipeater was operational.\nEven with the level of activity I saw on the ISS passes, I don't think\nthat approaches the almost chaotic conditions observed on some SO-50\npasses.\n\nI'm not calling for any changes to the restrictions on QSOs made\nvia FM satellites. I would like to see this restriction on QSOs per\norbiting digipeater reconsidered. It may have had a purpose in\nthe past, but I think that's where the restriction should remain -\nin the past. Otherwise, AMSAT's Field Day rules are slanted\nheavily toward SSB/CW transponders, at the expense of anything\nelse.\n\nThanks, and 73!\n\n\n\n\n\nPatrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK\nhttp://www.wd9ewk.net/\nTwitter: @WD9EWK\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOn Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Bruce <[email protected]> wrote:\n\n> It is never too early to begin preparing for field day. In fact, you might\n> want to take a look at two pages. I updated the Field Day Statistics page\n> (with 2016 numbers) and I created a new page with the results of Field Day\n> 2016.\n>\n> Both can be found by clicking on Events, Other Events and then Field Day\n>\n> If there is interest, I can add the results of previous years. Let me\n> know. I think I have them back to 2002.\n>\n> Enjoy\n>\n> 73...bruce\n>\n",
    "attachments": []
}