Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6GIXD6Q3ABOADMUUU74XQ247Z5CGM73W/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "6GIXD6Q3ABOADMUUU74XQ247Z5CGM73W",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/RUIVHYKOE6NAUCAHEBFHHYE2U5LCGEJV/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "vk4tec (a) tech-software.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Andrew Rich",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] ISS ping box (now PBBS)",
    "date": "2016-09-23T13:41:31Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/KMV4JEOABDIXGNWDCFEZEPRSTMFOG66U/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Like a space transponder ? \n\n-----------------------------\nSent from my iPhone\nAndrew Rich\ne [email protected]\nw www.tech-software.net\nm 0419 738 223\n\n> On 23 Sep 2016, at 22:22, Edson W. R. Pereira <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n> What would be required (from the point of view of paper work, logistics,\n> approvals, etc.) to replace the current ISS packet radio TNC by a device\n> that would implement some more efficient digital communications? The device\n> could be a digipeater, but employing strong FEC and a more modern\n> modulation and framing structure and perhaps some better scheme for channel\n> access. Perhaps something similar to ngham.\n> \n> https://github.com/skagmo/ngham\n> \n> With FEC and higher speed, we could accommodate many more users on a single\n> pass. A dedicated software application on the ground would implement the\n> modem and process information -- separating different types of messages in\n> different screens, providing a chat like mode for real-time communications,\n> automatically forwarding APRS packets, etc.\n> \n> Am I day dreaming?\n> \n> 73, Edson PY2SDR\n> \n> \n> \n> ---\n> - We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together.\n> - Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se\n> trabalharmos juntos.\n> \n> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Robert Bruninga <[email protected]> wrote:\n> \n>>> Andrew, What you should be doing is try using the onboard packet BBS.\n>> \n>> WHAT?!!!  NO!!!\n>> \n>> Packet BBS operation via space was proved to be entirely inoperable,\n>> impossible total congestion,, inefficient, impractical, wasteful and\n>> discunctional use of packet via satllites 20 years ago.  That is why all\n>> operation now uses single packet exchanges using UNPROTO or UI packets and\n>> why UI messaging was invented.\n>> \n>> All it takes is one person to try to log on, and then the ENTIRE PASS is\n>> lost to retries and retries and retries.  Nothing is accomplished, and\n>> rarely if ever does anyone even get logged on.  It is an abomination to\n>> even think about using the ISS BBS.\n>> \n>>> That way people could read and send you messages.\n>>> As you're in a low use ISS area this would be ideal for\n>>> you and other ISS users...\n>> \n>> Oops... nevermind... I see you are on an island thousands of miles from\n>> any Ham Radio density...\n>> \n>> But again, this will ONLY work over Hawaii, or Australia, or South Africa\n>> or other areas where packet ISS usage is so low as to be non-existant.  In\n>> those places, yes, it would be a fun experiment.  BUT ONLY UNTIL others\n>> heard about it.  Then it would be the same ole' \"tradgedy of the\n>> commons\"... (google it)...  Everybody tries and it fails for everyone....\n>> \n>> And a disaster if anyone tried it over the USA or Europe.\n>> \n>> Bob, WB4APR\n>> \n>> -----Original Message-----\n>>> If you're the only station out there, then what's the point of\n>> transmitting at all?\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions\n>> expressed\n>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of\n>> AMSAT-NA.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n> _______________________________________________\n> Sent via [email protected]. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available\n> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed\n> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.\n> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\n> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}