Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6GLLDEPKYJJQTZWXK3LKQVG7MU6OJSOK/",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "6GLLDEPKYJJQTZWXK3LKQVG7MU6OJSOK",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/NU4QTMIQIABVUXOSPY74SBXZHRZVZR6A/",
    "sender": {
        "address": "kshaddrick (a) jetup.net",
        "mailman_id": "631e16f22254408cbccd52c16d608ede",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/631e16f22254408cbccd52c16d608ede/emails/"
    },
    "sender_name": "Kelley",
    "subject": "Re: [amsat-bb] Expectations...",
    "date": "2015-01-02T17:47:25Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/GRBE56YBNWYRTLQPNXA2U2JVVUZEHDK7/",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IFANBSG2KPAFN7JTKJJNWWU7ENSVI653/"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\nThanks for the info Clayton. I hope to play around with the Doppler on \nthe next pass in a little over an hour. Sometime ago I bought Satpc32 \nbut have never been successful in setting it up for my single \nIC-760MKIIG. Although I have other CAT programs that work fine with the \nradio, I can never seem to get that one to work. Seems like it would be \na good one to do the Doppler shift with. Any thoughts on how to set this \nup? Or is one better off doing it manually?\n\nThanks,\n\nKelley - WØRK\n\nOn 1/2/2015 12:10 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:\n>\n> The #1 thing I've noticed is how much more important it is to tune for \n> Doppler shift than when the ISS was using the Kenwood radio.\n>\n> I've done several tests decoding packets using my Kenwood TM-D700 \n> which has 5 kHz tuning steps common on most 2m FM radios and then \n> compared results to my Yaesu FT-857D which has much finer incremental \n> tuning.\n>\n> In the past, I could decode most of a pass simply staying on 145.825 \n> MHz.  Nowadays, I start decoding around 145.828 and usually by LOS I'm \n> decoding near 145.822.\n>\n> With the smaller tuning steps of the FT-857D I am able to decode about \n> 30% more packets than my TM-D700.\n>\n> Simply put, in the past a fixed station could stay on 145.825 MHz with \n> great results. Today, not so much.\n>\n> 73\n> Clayton\n> W5PFG\n>\n> On Jan 1, 2015 9:10 PM, \"Kelley\" <[email protected] \n> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:\n>\n>\n>     I put up a new antenna for ISS work today. It's a home-built 2m\n>     turnstile with reflectors. Numbers wise (SWR, etc., as read on a\n>     MFJ analyzer) the antenna is working. I used the antenna a bit on\n>     APRS and was able to hear stations and be heard by stations.\n>\n>     I listened to the ISS for 3 passes earlier today. On the first 2\n>     passes I heard a number of stations, but was unable to digi via\n>     the ISS. On the third pass (about 40 degrees elevation at max and\n>     to the south), I was able to digi via the ISS (sorry if I have the\n>     terminology wrong here, I'm somewhat new at this).\n>\n>     My question is, how often should I be able to digi via the ISS? Is\n>     it unusual to not be able to on a given pass (all 3 passes were\n>     higher elevation passes)? I know there are collisions and QRM\n>     involved and someone wins out. I don't have the best station\n>     (IC-706MKIIG and a turnstile antenna), I'm sure this plays a part.\n>\n>     Curious what others have experienced.\n>\n>     Thanks,\n>     -- \n>     Kelley - WØRK\n>\n>     _______________________________________________\n>     Sent via [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. AMSAT-NA\n>     makes this open forum available\n>     to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.\n>     Opinions expressed\n>     are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official\n>     views of AMSAT-NA.\n>     Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite\n>     program!\n>     Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}