Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6LEWVJJRHF6ORBOVSKA432ISAXVXEULG/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "6LEWVJJRHF6ORBOVSKA432ISAXVXEULG",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/JBLHXLG4HMDRUTO7OA54AEBJUTE5ZCJG/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gary_mayfield (a) hotmail.com",
        "mailman_id": "fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/fe442cdc520e4857a9168b9182091295/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?",
    "date": "2009-01-07T13:51:35Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/RXKMYEFWA5WNYS2O5ADBRST4X37ZP6BY/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Sebastian makes a great point, and the other side of the coin is LOTW\ncontains all the information needed for Satellite VUCC.  One would hope it\nwill get added to the list soon.\n\n73,\nJoe\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On\nBehalf Of Sebastian\nSent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 12:40 PM\nTo: AMSAT BB\nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?\n\nIf you are chasing  VUCC - LoTW currently is not configured for VUCC.\n\nI still upload those logs however, in hope that if they ever do  \nconfigure it for VUCC, my data is there.\n\n73 de W4AS\nSebastian\n\nOn Dec 31, 2008, at 12:51 AM, John W Lee wrote:\n\n>\n> Alan,\n> There is no reason you can't upload to both E-QSL and LOTW.\n>\n> I send in my logs monthly to both.   E-QSL's really don't count for  \n> any\n> of the major awards.\n>\n> LOTW confirmations count for DXCC and WAS.\n>\n> 73,\n> John K6YK\n>\n>\n> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:56:30 -0600 (CST) \"Alan Sieg WB5RMG\"\n> <[email protected]> writes:\n>> I started using eQSL a year or so back, and have only recently seen\n>> enough\n>> action in my log to warrant uploading new contacts. I've been trying\n>> to\n>> go back thru old logs, and get caught up on returning some QSLs...\n>>\n>> Seems what I'm hearing is that some do eQSL, some LOTW, others only\n>> paper...\n>> Reckon is there any harm in also doing LOTW ?     How many do both\n>> ?\n>> I'm sure that there are some that don't do either - no great loss I\n>> guess.\n>>   /;^)\n>> -- \n>>  <- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->\n>>\n_______________________________________________\nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!\nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n\n",
    "attachments": []
}