Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6N2L3QQDV63HRHX6YQQ6Z7APXAYUIN7V/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "929222875.1162268.1281414927089.JavaMail.root@sz0126a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net",
    "message_id_hash": "6N2L3QQDV63HRHX6YQQ6Z7APXAYUIN7V",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/WQBBT4PNP7LKOLXRMECOEO3NVFW2GVLT/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "w7lrd (a) comcast.net",
        "mailman_id": "717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7",
        "emails": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/sender/717aa2a241704c7497e9abd8c983f6b7/emails/?format=api"
    },
    "sender_name": "Bob- W7LRD",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: TubeSats - DIY Satellites",
    "date": "2010-08-10T04:35:27Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/3T3AWFFPTKH3EJSZCXURYSITWKRJDXED/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "\n\nCould we have \"something\" sitting on the shelf for such sort notice occurrences?  I am not privy to the exhaustive red tape that must surely exist.  I am most likely over simplifying the process.  Back in my corner. \n\n73 Bob W7LRD \n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"George Henry\" <[email protected]> \nTo: \"amsat bb\" <[email protected]> \nSent: Monday, August 9, 2010 4:29:27 PM \nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: TubeSats - DIY Satellites \n\nOn a sort-of-positive note, Interorbital Systems' website shows that they \ncurrently have an open CubeSat slot on their December launch, at only \n$12,500.  Unfortunately, it is only to a 310 kM orbit.  A future launch will \ncarry payloads to 600 kM.  No price listed for that launch yet... \n\n\nGeorge, KA3HSW \n\n\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Lee McLamb\" <[email protected]> \nTo: <[email protected]> \nSent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:17 PM \nSubject: [amsat-bb] Re: TubeSats - DIY Satellites \n\n\n> All satellites must be operated as part of a licensed service.  To the \n> best of \n> my knowledge there is no equivalent to the FCC's Part 15 for satellite \n> operations.  Further since it is required that all satellites have the \n> capability of being commanded off, two-way communication is also always \n> required.  It is a mistake I see frequently that people think that local \n> rules \n> regarding low power RF emitters can be applied to a project with \n> international \n> implications like a satellite. \n> \n> \n> 73, \n> Lee-KU4OS \n> \n> On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:22:58 pm George Henry wrote: \n>> Quote:  \"If the your (sic) TubeSat application does not require two-way \n>> communications, a radio operator's license is not required\" \n>> \n>> \n>> Downlink frequencies available:  amateur 433 MHz 500 mW, \"license-free\" \n>> 902 \n>> - 928 MHz or 2.400 - 2.4835 GHz, 100 mW - 1000 mW \"selectable\" \n>> \n>> Last I knew, 902 - 928 MHz had no US or international allocation \n>> for satellite downlink use, the amateur downlink frequency conflicts with \n>> the US band plan (the launch company is US-based), and isn't the \n>> space-to-earth allocation at 2400 - 2483.5 ONLY for amateur radio \n>> satellites? \n>> \n>> \n>> George, KA3HSW \n\n_______________________________________________ \nSent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author. \nNot an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! \nSubscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb \n",
    "attachments": []
}