Email Detail

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6RQ2MG52F36TEHGFYHCVJDI4XLPTEJWT/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "[email protected]",
    "message_id_hash": "6RQ2MG52F36TEHGFYHCVJDI4XLPTEJWT",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/D2SHA7WJAIRVODYBTP5GLMVGFY32GAMK/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "gordonjcp (a) gjcp.net",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "Gordon JC Pearce",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: Gain VS Bandwidth at 2.4GHZ",
    "date": "2009-05-17T18:48:57Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/OA2AEIM6B6TQAT6P2S3XFK7FVK5B7JIF/?format=api",
    "children": [],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Roger Kolakowski wrote:\n> Not that they were optimum tuned for the 2.5 GHz frequency but what polarity\n> were the \"Pringles Can\" washer antennas that were so popular for\n> Net-Stumbling a few years ago?\n> \n\nTheoretically linear, but they should be considered to be a quarter wave \nvertical with some crap lying around in the nearfield.  They don't have \nany gain, and they certainly don't work as yagis - in fact, they work \nbetter sideways!\n\nThe can needs to be made of metal, and about 85mm in diameter.  That \nwill give you a belter of a wifi antenna.  The threaded rod and washer \nidea is just stupid.  Leave that off.\n\nGordon\n",
    "attachments": []
}