Show an email

GET /hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6W6VTF3PII5KMQSDAMLQ46QHGYSVSP4H/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "url": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/6W6VTF3PII5KMQSDAMLQ46QHGYSVSP4H/?format=api",
    "mailinglist": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/?format=api",
    "message_id": "3442A86CEDAE4A26BCC10C2E80BB9C94@acer61a4596bd3",
    "message_id_hash": "6W6VTF3PII5KMQSDAMLQ46QHGYSVSP4H",
    "thread": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/thread/7VUPA24MGFKJYOAS3U74YNVDEW5NPQYU/?format=api",
    "sender": {
        "address": "aa5jg (a) fidmail.com",
        "mailman_id": null,
        "emails": null
    },
    "sender_name": "John Geiger",
    "subject": "[amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs",
    "date": "2011-01-24T23:33:19Z",
    "parent": "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/IOBNF42UWURKAUH4LRYLXRBARX4XVUNK/?format=api",
    "children": [
        "https://mailman.amsat.org/hyperkitty/api/list/[email protected]/email/2BGNWHCVQ6G4AROIWJI6KV4AR24BCJFT/?format=api"
    ],
    "votes": {
        "likes": 0,
        "dislikes": 0,
        "status": "neutral"
    },
    "content": "Even at the 16 cent a QSO LOTW fee that sure is a jump up in price from what \nit used to be.  I am afraid I won't be able to afford many endorsements. \nmaybe AMSAT can offer their own version of a satellite VUCC.\n\n73s John AA5JG\n\n----- Original Message ----- \nFrom: \"Jeff Yanko\" <[email protected]>\nTo: \"John Geiger\" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; \n\"Amsat-Bb@Amsat. Org\" <[email protected]>; \"'VHF REFLECTOR'\" \n<[email protected]>\nSent: Monday, January 24, 2011 10:23 PM\nSubject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs\n\n\n> Hi John,\n>\n> It's funny how HQ never came out and stated there would be new fees \n> beginning of the new year.  Then again why would you want to scare away \n> potential customers?  In any case, I finally took my cards over to the \n> local card checker to have him verify them for VUCC Satellite.  My cost? \n> $47.40. I understand it's a one time deal for the initial application, \n> which this was, and there costs involved.  Just the 20 cent per QSO fee \n> cost me $27.40 alone.  That's more than the award cost itself.  Actually, \n> more than twice of what the award cost.  Doesn't make any economical or \n> logical sense if you ask me.  I don't believe I'll be doing many, if any, \n> endorsements of VUCC at the current fees level.\n>\n>\n>\n> 73,\n>\n> Jeff  WB3JFS\n>\n>\n>\n>\n> ----- Original Message ----- \n> From: \"John Geiger\" <[email protected]>\n> To: <[email protected]>; \"Amsat-Bb@Amsat. Org\" <[email protected]>; \n> \"'VHF REFLECTOR'\" <[email protected]>\n> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 6:07 AM\n> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs\n>\n>\n>>I WAS going to get an endorsement for my satellite and six meter VUCCs, \n>>but\n>> given that it would cost me around 35 dollars each to get an endorsement \n>> for\n>> an extra 150 grids, I don't think so. Hope this new insane fee schedule\n>> doesn't kill VUCC submissions.  I think AMSAT awards will be getting much\n>> more popular.\n>>\n>> 73s John AA5JG\n>>\n>> ----- Original Message ----- \n>> From: <[email protected]>\n>> To: <[email protected]>\n>> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:25 PM\n>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC costs\n>>\n>>\n>>> Nice explanation of the costs for VUCC in the Jeff Yanko blog. However, \n>>> I\n>>> did\n>>> not see what happens with LOTW submisions.\n>>>\n>>> If the cost of awards keep going up, maybe the ARRL should offer award\n>>> insurance\n>>> as well as equipment insurance.  Just a thought.  :>)\n>>>\n>>> Merle, AA4QE\n>>>\n>>> _______________________________________________\n>>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>>> program!\n>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>> _______________________________________________\n>> Sent via [email protected]. Opinions expressed are those of the author.\n>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite \n>> program!\n>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb\n>>\n>\n> \n\n",
    "attachments": []
}